Relationships Between the BRIEF/BRIEF-SR and Performance-Based Neuropsychological Tests in Adolescents with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:0
作者
John W. Lace
Zachary C. Merz
Alex F. Grant
Carson L. Teague
Stephanie Aylward
Jill Dorflinger
Jeffrey D. Gfeller
机构
[1] Saint Louis University,Department of Psychology
[2] University of North Carolina,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
[3] Chapel Hill,Department of Psychology
[4] Illinois Institute of Technology,Center for Pediatric Brain
[5] AMITA Health Neurosciences Institute,undefined
来源
Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology | 2019年 / 5卷
关键词
Mild traumatic brain injury; Neuropsychological testing; Behavioral rating scales; BRIEF; BRIEF-SR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical neuropsychologists typically use both performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales as part of comprehensive assessment. However, literature has suggested that performance-based tests account for limited variance in behavioral rating scales in healthy and clinical populations. Importantly, little work has investigated the relationships between performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales in adolescent mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The present study was retrospective in nature and included 136 adolescents (M age = 14.97; 56% female) in the post-acute phase of recovery from mTBI (M days since injury = 33.4) referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Participants were administered a multi-domain neuropsychological test battery with measures of reaction time, processing speed, sustained attention, impulsivity, working memory, and verbal and visual memory, and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and BRIEF-Self Report (BRIEF-SR). Results revealed mean neuropsychological test performance and parent- and self-reported executive dysfunction within the average range. Hierarchical multiple regressions revealed that performance-based test scores accounted for between 13 and 18% variance in BRIEF scores and between 8 and 14% variance in BRIEF-SR scores after controlling for demographic factors (which accounted for 3% variance in BRIEF scores and 7–10% variance in BRIEF-SR scores). Processing speed emerged as the most consistent significant individual predictor of BRIEF/BRIEF-SR scores across regression analyses. These findings build on previous literature by suggesting relatively limited psychometric overlap between performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales, such that these approaches likely assess distinct and unique psychological constructs. Relationships to previous work, limitations of the current study, and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 176
页数:13
相关论文
共 368 条
  • [1] Anderson VA(2002)Relationships between cognitive and behavioral measures of executive function in children with brain disease Child Neuropsychology 8 231-240
  • [2] Anderson P(2009)Neurocognitive outcomes and recovery after pediatric TBI: Meta-analytic review of the literature Neuropsychology 23 283-296
  • [3] Northam E(2015)Gender differences in recovery from sports-related concussion in adolescents Clinical Pediatrics 55 771-775
  • [4] Jacobs R(2009)Executive functioning, awareness, and participation in daily life after mild traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study American Journal of Occupational Therapy 63 634-640
  • [5] Mikiewicz O(2015)The incidence of postconcussion syndrome remains stable following mild traumatic brain injury in children Pediatric Neurology 53 491-497
  • [6] Babikian T(2011)Neuropsychological and behavioral measures of attention assess different constructs in children with traumatic brain injury The Clinical Neuropsychologist 25 1145-1157
  • [7] Asarnow R(2004)The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage Brain and Cognition 55 30-40
  • [8] Baker JG(1994)Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex Cognition 50 7-15
  • [9] Leddy JJ(2005)The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 159-162
  • [10] Darling SR(1998)Hopkins verbal learning test—revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability The Clinical Neuropsychologist 12 43-55