The value of neurophysiological and imaging studies in predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy

被引:0
作者
Mogdad F. Alrawi
Nofal M. Khalil
Piers Mitchell
Sean P. Hughes
机构
[1] Imperial College,Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital Campus
[2] Charing Cross Hospital,Department of Clinical Neurophysiology
[3] The Royal Victoria Infirmary,Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
来源
European Spine Journal | 2007年 / 16卷
关键词
Cervical radiculopathy; Neurophysiological studies; AcroMed; fusion cage; Outcome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is not always easy to predict the degree of symptomatic improvement to be expected in a patient undergoing surgery for cervical disc herniation and radiculopathy. Here we investigate whether preoperative electromyography (EMG) can help select those most likely to benefit from intervention. We prospectively evaluated 20 patients whose required operative level was unclear after clinical examination and MRI scan alone. The surgical procedures was anterior cervical interbody fusion with the AcroMed® carbon fibre cage. Clinical assessment employed using validated scoring systems (Prolo functional and economic scoring system). Patients underwent MRI preoperatively, and were assessed pre and postoperatively with neurophysiological studies (NPS) including nerve conduction studies and concentric needle EMG. Patients with preoperative evidence of cervical nerve root involvement on EMG (group A, n = 8) had better outcome (P = 0.001) following discectomy and anterior fusion than patients who had no evidence of nerve root damage on EMG (group B, n = 12). Prolo mean score ± SEM for group A was 7.375 ± 0.3750 and for group B was 5.583 ±  0.2876. Thus, NPS are a valuable tool in selecting patients in this subgroup for cervical surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 500
页数:5
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [21] Alaranta H(1998)A prospective randomized study of anterior single level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary Neurosurg 43 51-210
  • [22] Fisher MA(1976)Late results of cervical disc surgery J Neurosurg 45 203-1785
  • [23] Hoover BB(1999)Comparison of computed tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy Spine 1 24 1781-404
  • [24] Caldwell JW(1983)Observation on the application of electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis of cervical root compressions Eur Neurol 22 397-214
  • [25] Krusen EM(1996)Follow- up study on F- Wave in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy. Comparison between before and after surgery Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 36 207-842
  • [26] Muckeltos RN(1993)A preoperative and postoperative study of the accuracy and value of electrodiagnosis in patients with lumbosacral disc herniation Spine 1 18 837-346
  • [27] Jho HD(2000)Cervical discectomy. A prospective analysis of three operative techniques Surg Neurol 53 340-undefined
  • [28] Kim WK(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [29] Kim MH(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [30] Khan MR(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined