An Educational Need Regarding Treatment-Related Infertility and Fertility Preservation: a National Survey Among Members of the Dutch Society for Medical Oncologists

被引:0
作者
E. M. Krouwel
E. M. L. Birkhoff
M. P. J. Nicolai
S. Osanto
H. Putter
R. C. M. Pelger
H. W. Elzevier
机构
[1] Leiden University Medical Centre,Department of Urology
[2] Leiden University Medical Centre,Department of Medical Decision Making
[3] Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital,Department of Urology
[4] Leiden University Medical Centre,Department of Oncology
[5] Leiden University Medical Centre,Department of Medical Statistics
来源
Journal of Cancer Education | 2023年 / 38卷
关键词
Cancer; Fertility; Cryopreservation; Fertility preservation; Oncologist; Quality of life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cancer diagnosis and treatment may influence reproductive planning and impact fertility in patients of reproductive age. Although guidelines have been established in the past decade, education, practice, and attitudes of medical oncologists regarding fertility preservation remain undecided. A nationwide survey was performed among members of the Dutch Society for Medical Oncology. Demographics, practice, knowledge, and barriers were measured regarding information provision of fertility preservation towards cancer patients of childbearing age. From 392 members, 120 oncologists completed the questionnaire (30.6%). Majority of oncologists was convinced it is their responsibility to discuss impact of cancer treatment to fertility (93.2%), yet 68.3% discussed the subject often or always (n = 82). Oncologists employed in district general hospitals were less likely to discuss fertility (p = 0.033). On average, 44.6% of reproductive men and 28.9% of reproductive women is referred to fertility specialists. Half of the respondents declared to possess sufficient knowledge regarding fertility preservation (n = 57, 47.5%). Poor prognosis (53%), unlikely survival (43.1%), and high chances on fertility recovery (28.7%) were identified as barriers to discussing fertility preservation. Among oncologists, impact of cancer treatment on fertility is a well-accepted responsibility to counsel. Despite, self-reported knowledge regarding fertility preservation is strongly varying. In practice, fertility is discussed to some extent, influenced by several barriers and depending on prognosis and type of hospital. Patients benefit from knowledge improvement among oncology care providers concerning fertility effects of cancer treatment. Education during medical school, residency, and among practicing oncologists may raise awareness, together with enhancement of referral possibilities.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 114
页数:8
相关论文
共 192 条
[1]  
Ajala T(2010)Fertility preservation for cancer patients: a review Obstet Gynecol Int 2010 2805-2812
[2]  
Rafi J(2014)Desire for children, difficulties achieving a pregnancy, and infertility distress 3 to 7 years after cancer diagnosis Support Care Cancer 22 2147-2153
[3]  
Larsen-Disney P(2012)Sex differences in fertility-related information received by young adult cancer survivors J Clin Oncol 30 2413-2419
[4]  
Howell R(2012)The current fertility preservation consultation model: are we adequately informing cancer patients of their options? Hum Reprod 27 2228-2237
[5]  
Armuand GM(2014)Referral for fertility preservation counselling in female cancer patients Hum Reprod 29 379-390
[6]  
Wettergren L(2012)Chemotherapy and fertility Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26 480-489
[7]  
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA(2007)Gonadal dysfunction and fertility problems in cancer survivors Acta Oncol 46 115-122
[8]  
Lampic C(2016)Patient-physician communication and knowledge regarding fertility issues from german oncologists’ perspective-a quantitative survey J Cancer Educ 31 236-246
[9]  
Armuand GM(2010)A cross-sectional study of the psychosexual impact of cancer-related infertility in women: third-party reproductive assistance J Cancer Surviv 4 160-5830
[10]  
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA(2009)Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: An observational study BMC Health Serv Res 9 5814-714