SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (2018)

被引:0
作者
A. González del Alba
G. De Velasco
N. Lainez
P. Maroto
R. Morales-Barrera
J. Muñoz-Langa
B. Pérez-Valderrama
L. Basterretxea
C. Caballero
S. Vazquez
机构
[1] Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda,Medical Oncology Department
[2] Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre,Medical Oncology Department
[3] Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra,Medical Oncology Department
[4] Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau,Medical Oncology Department
[5] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology,Medical Oncology Department
[6] Vall d’ Hebron University Hospital,Medical Oncology Department
[7] Hospital Universitari I Politècnic la Fe,Medical Oncology Department
[8] Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio,Medical Oncology Department
[9] Hospital Donostia-Donostia Ospitalea,Medical Oncology Department
[10] Ciberonc,Medical Oncology Department
[11] Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer. Hospital General Universitario de Valencia,undefined
[12] Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti,undefined
来源
Clinical and Translational Oncology | 2019年 / 21卷
关键词
Bladder cancer; Cystectomy; Chemotherapy; Immune checkpoint inhibitors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this article is to provide recommendations about the management of muscle-invasive (MIBC) and metastatic bladder cancer. New molecular subtypes of MIBC are associated with specific clinical–pathological characteristics. Radical cystectomy and lymph node dissection are the gold standard for treatment and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a cisplatin-based combination should be recommended in fit patients. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in MIBC remains controversial; its use must be considered in patients with high-risk who are able to tolerate a cisplatin-based regimen, and have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Bladder-preserving approaches are reasonable alternatives to cystectomy in selected patients for whom cystectomy is not contemplated either for clinical or personal reasons. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is the standard first-line protocol for metastatic disease. In the case of unfit patients, carboplatin–gemcitabine should be considered the preferred first-line chemotherapy treatment option, while pembrolizumab and atezolizumab can be contemplated for individuals with high PD-L1 expression. In cases of progression after platinum-based therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are standard alternatives. Vinflunine is another option when anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy is not possible. There are no data from randomized clinical trials regarding moving on to immuno-oncology agents.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 74
页数:10
相关论文
共 344 条
[1]  
Bray F(2018)Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin 68 394-424
[2]  
Ferlay J(2017)Cancer incidence in Spain, 2015 Clin Transl Oncol 19 799-825
[3]  
Soerjomataram I(2016)SEOM Clinical Guideline for treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (2016) Clin Transl Oncol 18 1197-1205
[4]  
Galceran J(2010)Molecular genesis of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (NMIUC) Expert Rev Mol Med 12 e10-556.e25
[5]  
Ameijide A(2017)Comprehensive molecular characterization of muscle-invasive bladder cancer Cell 171 540-976
[6]  
Carulla M(2013)An APOBEC cytidine deaminase mutagenesis pattern is widespread in human cancers Nat Genet 45 970-218
[7]  
Lazaro M(2013)Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes Nature 499 214-74
[8]  
Gallardo E(2015)Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy Science 348 69-803
[9]  
Domenech M(2013)Oncogenic FGFR3 gene fusions in bladder cancer Hum Mol Genet 22 795-752
[10]  
Pollard C(2000)Molecular portraits of human breast tumours Nature 406 747-3115