Mathematical Reasoning Requirements in Swedish National Physics Tests

被引:0
作者
Helena Johansson
机构
[1] University of Gothenburg,
来源
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education | 2016年 / 14卷
关键词
Creative mathematical reasoning; Mathematical reasoning; Physics tests; Swedish national assessment; Upper secondary school;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper focuses on one aspect of mathematical competence, namely mathematical reasoning, and how this competency influences students’ knowing of physics. This influence was studied by analysing the mathematical reasoning requirements upper secondary students meet when solving tasks in national physics tests. National tests are constructed to mirror the goals stated in the curricula, and these goals are similar across national borders. The framework used for characterising the mathematical reasoning required to solve the tasks in the national physics tests distinguishes between imitative and creative mathematical reasoning. The analysis process consisted of structured comparisons between representative student solutions and the students’ educational history. Of the 209 analysed tasks, 3/4 required mathematical reasoning in order to be solved. Creative mathematical reasoning, which, in particular, involves reasoning based on intrinsic properties, was required for 1/3 of the tasks. The results in this paper give strong evidence that creative mathematical reasoning is required to achieve higher grades on the tests. It is also confirmed that mathematical reasoning is an important and integral part of the physics curricula; and, it is suggested that the ability to use creative mathematical reasoning is necessary to fully master the curricula.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1152
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Basson I(2002)Physics and mathematics as interrelated fields of thought development using acceleration as an example International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 33 679-690
  • [2] Blum W(1991)Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects—state, trends and issues in mathematics instruction Educational Studies in Mathematics 22 37-68
  • [3] Niss M(2010)The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning student use Educational Studies in Mathematics 75 89-105
  • [4] Boesen J(1993)Textbook treatments and students’ understanding of acceleration Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 621-635
  • [5] Lithner J(2009)Emergent modeling: Discrete graphs to support the understanding of change and velocity ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education 41 199-211
  • [6] Palm T(2002)Another approach to proof: Arguments from physics ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education 34 1-8
  • [7] Dall’Alba G(1997)Recognising mathematical creativity in schoolchildren ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education 29 68-74
  • [8] Walsh E(2008)A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning Educational Studies in Mathematics 67 255-276
  • [9] Bowden J(2004)How students use physics to reason about calculus tasks School Science and Mathematics 104 258-272
  • [10] Martin E(2012)Views about learning physics held by physics teachers with differing approaches to teaching physics Journal of Science Teacher Education 23 429-449