Ideology and Gender in U.S. House Elections

被引:0
作者
Danielle M. Thomsen
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Political Science
[2] Irvine,Center for the Study of Democratic Politics
[3] Princeton University,undefined
来源
Political Behavior | 2020年 / 42卷
关键词
Gender; Ideology; Congressional elections; Partisan gap;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Studies of gender-ideology stereotypes suggest that voters evaluate male and female candidates in different ways, yet data limitations have hindered an analysis of candidate ideology, sex, and actual election outcomes. This article draws on a new dataset of male and female primary and general election candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives from 1980 to 2012. I find little evidence that the relationship between ideology and victory patterns differs for male and female candidates. Neither Republican nor Democratic women experience distinct electoral fates than ideologically similar men. Candidate sex and ideology do interact in other ways, however; Democratic women are more liberal than their male counterparts, and they are advantaged in primaries over Republican women as well as Democratic men. The findings have important implications for contemporary patterns of women’s representation, and they extend our understanding of gender bias and neutrality in American elections.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 442
页数:27
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [11] Poole KT(2014)Gender stereotypes, information search, and voting behavior in political campaigns Political Behavior 6 1-21
  • [12] Rosenthal H(2008)Whither republican women: The growing partisan gap among women in congress The Forum 36 181-202
  • [13] Brady DW(2009)Are female house members still more liberal in a polarized era? The conditional nature of the relationship between descriptive and substantive representation Congress & the Presidency 101 327-356
  • [14] Han H(1986)The political culture of the democratic and republican parties Political Science Quarterly 65 303-314
  • [15] Pope JC(2012)Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and electoral success Political Research Quarterly 13 119-139
  • [16] Burden B(2015)Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats: The asymmetry of American party politics Perspectives on Politics 7 133-165
  • [17] Canes-Wrone B(2011)When gender and party collide: Stereotyping in candidate trait attribution Politics & Gender 13 95-118
  • [18] Brady DW(2015)A non-gendered lens? Media, voters, and female candidates in contemporary congressional elections Perspectives on Politics 95 1194-1212
  • [19] Cogan JF(2014)Who cares what they wear? Media, gender, and the influence of candidate appearance Social Science Quarterly 95 619-631
  • [20] Cassese EC(2001)Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization American Political Science Review 5 169-191