Use of plant products and copepods for control of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti

被引:0
作者
K. Murugan
Jiang-Shiou Hwang
K. Kovendan
K. Prasanna Kumar
C. Vasugi
A. Naresh Kumar
机构
[1] Bharathiar University,Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences
[2] National Taiwan Ocean University,Institute of Marine Biology
来源
Hydrobiologia | 2011年 / 666卷
关键词
Neem; Predation; Mosquito control;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The efficacy of plant extracts (neem tree, Azadirachta indica A. Juss.; Meliaceae) and copepods [Mesocyclops aspericornis (Daday)] for the control of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti L. was tested in the laboratory. Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE) at 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 ppm caused significant mortality of Ae. aegypti larvae. Lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC90) were worked out. The LC50 and LC90 values for I to IV larval instars were 111.98, 138.34, 158.93, 185.22 ppm and for pupae was 146.13 ppm, respectively. The LC90 value of I instar was 372.95 ppm, II instar was 422.77 ppm, III instar was 440.63 ppm, IV instar was 456.96 ppm, and pupae was 476.92 ppm, respectively. A study was conducted to test the whether the predatory efficiency of copepods on first instars changed in the presence of NSKE. The percentage of predatory efficiency of copepod was 6.80% in treatments without NSKE and the percentage of predatory efficiency increased up to 8.40% when copepods were combined with NSKE. This increase in predation efficiency may caused by detrimental effects of the neem active principle compound (Azadirachtin) on the mosquito larvae. Our results suggest that the combined application of copepods and neem extract to control Aedes populations is feasible. Repeated application of neem does not cause changes in copepod populations, because neem is highly degradable in the environment.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 148 条
  • [1] Abbott WS(1925)A method of computing the effectiveness of insecticides Journal of Economic Entomology 18 267-269
  • [2] Batra CP(1998)Efficacy of neem-water emulsion against mosquito immatures Indian Journal of Malariol 35 15-21
  • [3] Mittal PK(1984)Resistance mechanisms to DDT and transpermethrin in Pesticide Science 15 121-133
  • [4] Adak T(1984)The freshwater Copepoda of Costa Rica with notes on some species Hydrobiologia 119 89-99
  • [5] Sharma VP(2002)Dengue: an update Lancet Infectious Diseases 2 33-42
  • [6] Breakley CJ(2005)Dispersal of the dengue vector American Journal of Tropical Medicine Hygiene 72 209-220
  • [7] Crampton PL(2000) within and between rural communities, part 1 Review Latino American of Microbiology 42 53-56
  • [8] Ricket FE(2003) (Copepoda: Cyclopoidea): a scanning electron microscopy study Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 98 191-198
  • [9] Chadwick PR(1938)Dispersal of Journal of Parasitology 24 281-66
  • [10] Collado CD(2006) and Annual Review of Entomology 51 45-1011