Comparison of the effects of alendronate and risedronate on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis

被引:0
作者
Mengu Sarioglu
Cigdem Tuzun
Zeliha Unlu
Canan Tikiz
Fatma Taneli
B. Sami. Uyanik
机构
[1] University of Celal Bayar,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine
[2] University of Celal Bayar,Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine
来源
Rheumatology International | 2006年 / 26卷
关键词
Osteoporosis; Alendronate; Risedronate; Bone turnover markers; Bone mineral density;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare the effects of once-weekly alendronate sodium and daily risedronate sodium treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporotic subjects. For this purpose, 50 patients were included in this study and randomly classified into two groups. Group I (n=25) received risedronate (5 mg/day) and group II (n=25) received alendronate Na (70 mg/week). The study duration was limited to 12 months. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by BMD measurements at spine and hip at 6th and 12th months of the treatment, as well as by the measurement of bone turnover markers such as serum osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BASP), urine deoxypyridinoline (DPD) and calcium/creatine ratio in 24-h urine at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months. The evaluation of the changes in BMD in all regions revealed a significant increase in BMD in both groups compared to baseline values except for spine (L2–L4) in alendronate group at 6th and 12th month and femoral neck in risedronate group at 6th month. However, the difference in percentage increase in BMD measurements was not statistically significant between the two groups at 6th and 12th months. In both groups, serum OC, BSAP and urine DPD were found to be significantly attenuated at 1st month of the treatment period, and continued to be lowered throughout the 3rd, 6th and 12th months (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically-significant difference between both groups of patients (P>0.05). In conclusion, our results suggest that both treatment protocols provide treatment options of similar efficiencyfor postmenopausal osteoporosis, and have almost-similar effects in enhancing the BMD and in slowing the bone turnover. Risedronate seems to havea more potent effect in the spinal region than that of alendronate, although this potency was not statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 200
页数:5
相关论文
共 182 条
[1]  
Garrett-Connor E(1991)The economic and human costs of osteoporotic fracture Osteoporos Int 1 114-117
[2]  
Ammann P(1995)Bone strength and its determinants Am J Med 98 3-8
[3]  
Rizzoli R(2003)New approaches to pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 14 13-18
[4]  
Akesson K(2003)An update on bisphosphonates Bull World Health Organ 81 657-664
[5]  
Cohen SB(2004)Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs Curr Rheumatol Rep 6 59-65
[6]  
Cummings SR(2002)Alendronate and osteoporosis Am J Med 112 281-289
[7]  
Karpf DB(1998)Risedronate treatment of postmenopausal women with low bone mass: preliminary data Drug Dis Today 3 69-78
[8]  
Harris F(1996)A 2-year phase II study with 1-year of follow-up of risedronate (NE-58095) in postmenopausal osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 6 256-495
[9]  
Genant HK(1997)Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral efficacy with risedronate therapy (VERT) study group Osteoporos Int 7 488-89
[10]  
Ensrud K(2000)Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.: a randomized control trial. Vertebral efficacy with Risedronate therapy (VERT) study group Osteoporos Int 11 83-1352