How participatory planning processes for transit-oriented development contribute to social sustainability

被引：1
作者：
Fernandez Milan B. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC) gGmbH, Torgauer Str. 12-15, Berlin
[2] Department of Economics and Climate Change Economic, Technische Universität Berlin, EB 238-240, Straße des 17. Juni 145, Berlin
来源：
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences | 2016年 / 6卷 / 3期
关键词：
Bus rapid transit; Public participation; Public transport accessibility levels; Public transport services; Transit-oriented development; Urban sustainability;
D O I：
10.1007/s13412-014-0217-5
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Transit-oriented development (TOD) is a relatively recent neighbourhood development concept associated with the three dimensions of urban sustainability (environmental, economic and social). Traditionally, TOD has been associated with environmental and economic benefits. Recent research has shown evidence of positive social outcomes related to the spatial characteristics of TOD areas. But the social sustainability that can be drawn from TOD interventions may multiply when designed through participatory planning processes. Here, I combine TOD literature with that of collaborative urban planning to highlight the potential of participatory TOD for urban social sustainability. © 2015, AESS.
引用
收藏
页码：520 / 524
页数：4
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Assefa G., Frostell B., Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: a case study of energy technologies, Technol Soc, 29, pp. 63-78, (2007)
  • [2] Ataov A., Ezgi Haliloglu Kahraman Z., Constructing collaborative processes through experiential learning: participatory planning in Kaymaklı, Turkey, Habitat Int, 33, pp. 378-386, (2009)
  • [3] Bailey K., Grossardt T., Pride-Wells M., Community design of a light rail transit-oriented development using casewise visual evaluation (CAVE), Socioecon Plan Sci, 41, pp. 235-254, (2007)
  • [4] Baumann C., White S., Making better choices: a systematic comparison of adversarial and collaborative approaches to the transport policy process, Transp Policy, 24, pp. 83-90, (2012)
  • [5] Belzer D., Autler G., Transit-Oriented Development: Moving From Rhetoric To Reality, (2002)
  • [6] Bertolini L., le Clercq F., Straatemeier T., Urban transportation planning in transition, Transp Policy, 15, pp. 69-72, (2008)
  • [7] Boarnet M.G., Compin N.S., Transit-oriented development in San Diego County, J Am Plan Assoc, 65, pp. 80-95, (1999)
  • [8] Brand P., Davila J.D., Mobility innovation at the urban margins, City, 15, pp. 647-661, (2011)
  • [9] Cervero R., Ferell C., Murphy C., Research results digest 52: transit-oriented development and joint development in the United States: a literature review, (2002)
  • [10] Chiu Y., Huang C., Ma C.-M., Assessment of China transit and economic efficiencies in a modified value-chains DEA model, Eur J Oper Res, 209, pp. 95-103, (2011)
1234567