Students’ Independent Use of Screencasts and Simulations to Construct Understanding of Solubility Concepts

被引:0
作者
Deborah G. Herrington
Ryan D. Sweeder
Jessica R. VandenPlas
机构
[1] Grand Valley State University,Lyman Briggs College
[2] Michigan State University,undefined
来源
Journal of Science Education and Technology | 2017年 / 26卷
关键词
Simulation; Screencast; General chemistry; Solubility; Eye tracking;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As students increasingly use online chemistry animations and simulations, it is becoming more important to understand how students independently engage with such materials and to develop a set of best practices for students’ use of these resources outside of the classroom. Most of the literature examining students’ use of animations and simulations has focused on classroom use with some studies suggesting that better outcomes are obtained when students use simulations with minimal guidance while others indicate the need for appropriate scaffolding. This study examined differences with respect to (1) student understanding of the concept of dissolution of ionic and covalent compounds in water and (2) student use of electronic resources when students were asked to complete an assignment either by manipulating a simulation on their own or by watching a screencast in which an expert manipulated the same simulation. Comparison of students’ pre- and posttest scores, answers to assignment questions, near-transfer follow-up questions, and eye-tracking analysis suggested that students who viewed the screencast gained a better understanding of the dissolving process, including interactions with water at the particulate level, particularly for covalent compounds. Additionally, the eye tracking indicated that there were significant differences in the ways that the different treatment groups (screencast or simulation) used the electronic resources.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 371
页数:12
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]  
Adams WK(2010)Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations Il Nuovo Cimento C 33 21-32
[2]  
Adams WK(2008)What levels of guidance promote engaged exploration with interactive simulations? AIP Conference Proceedings 1064 59-807
[3]  
Paulson A(2014)Words or pictures: a comparison of written and pictorial explanations of physical and chemical equilibria Int J Sci Educ 36 783-135
[4]  
Wieman CE(2010)An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations Learn Instr 20 123-1661
[5]  
Akaygun S(1998)Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction J Chem Educ 75 1658-201
[6]  
Jones LL(1987)HSC chemistry students’ understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds Res Sci Educ 17 192-41
[7]  
Boucheix J-M(2009)The limited benefits of rereading educational texts Contemp Educ Psychol 34 30-888
[8]  
Lowe RK(2007)Achieving greater feedback and flexibility using online pre-laboratory exercises with non-major chemistry students J Chem Educ 84 884-286
[9]  
Burke KA(2012)Effects of different multimedia presentations on viewers’ information-processing activities measured by eye-tracking technology J Sci Educ Technol 21 276-122
[10]  
Greenbowe TJ(2010)Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: seeing is understanding? Learn Instr 20 111-201