Detecting tax evasion: a co-evolutionary approach

被引:25
作者
Hemberg E. [1 ]
Rosen J. [2 ]
Warner G. [2 ]
Wijesinghe S. [2 ]
O’Reilly U.-M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science and AI Lab, 32 Vassar Street, Cambridge, 02139, MA
[2] The MITRE Corporation, 1550 Westbranch Drive, McLean, 22102, VA
关键词
Auditing policy; Co-evolution; Genetic algorithms; Grammatical evolution; Partnership tax; Tax evasion;
D O I
10.1007/s10506-016-9181-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present an algorithm that can anticipate tax evasion by modeling the co-evolution of tax schemes with auditing policies. Malicious tax non-compliance, or evasion, accounts for billions of lost revenue each year. Unfortunately when tax administrators change the tax laws or auditing procedures to eliminate known fraudulent schemes another potentially more profitable scheme takes it place. Modeling both the tax schemes and auditing policies within a single framework can therefore provide major advantages. In particular we can explore the likely forms of tax schemes in response to changes in audit policies. This can serve as an early warning system to help focus enforcement efforts. In addition, the audit policies can be fine tuned to help improve tax scheme detection. We demonstrate our approach using the iBOB tax scheme and show it can capture the co-evolution between tax evasion and audit policy. Our experiments shows the expected oscillatory behavior of a biological co-evolving system. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 182
页数:33
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
(2015)
[2]  
Allingham M.G., Sandmo A., Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis, J Public Econ, 1, 3-4, pp. 323-338, (1972)
[3]  
Andrei A.L., Comer K., Koehler M., An agent-based model of network effects on tax compliance and evasion, J Econ Psychol, 40, pp. 119-133, (2013)
[4]  
Andreoni J., Erard B., Feinstein J., Tax compliance, J Econ Lit, 36, pp. 818-860, (1998)
[5]  
Aubert S., Muller J.P., Incorporating institutions, norms and territories in a generic model to simulate the management of renewable resources, Artif Intell Law, 21, 1, pp. 47-78, (2013)
[6]  
Bench-Capon T., Araszkiewicz M., Ashley K., Atkinson K., Bex F., Borges F., Bourcier D., Bourgine P., Conrad J.G., Francesconi E., Et al., A history of ai and law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on ai and law, Artif Intell Law, 20, 3, pp. 215-319, (2012)
[7]  
Bloomquist K., Tax compliance as an evolutionary coordination game: an agent-based approach, Public Finance Rev, 39, 1, pp. 25-49, (2011)
[8]  
Bloomquist K.M., A comparison of agent-based models of income tax evasion, Soc Sci Comput Rev, 24, 4, pp. 411-425, (2006)
[9]  
Boer A., van Engers T., Agile: a problem-based model of regulatory policy making, Artif Intell Law, 21, 4, pp. 399-423, (2013)
[10]  
Bonchi F., Giannotti F., Mainetto G., Pedreschi D., A classification-based methodology for planning audit strategies in fraud detection. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 175–184, (1999)