Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China

[1] Center MM(2012)International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates Eur Urol 61 1079-1092

[2] Jemal A(2015)Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 313 390-397

[3] Lortet-Tieulent J(2012)Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening N Engl J Med 367 595-605

[4] Siddiqui MM(2015)Direct comparison of targeted MRI-guided biopsy with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in patients with previous negative prostate biopsies Urol Int 94 319-325

[5] Rais-Bahrami S(2015)Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients Eur Urol 67 787-794

[6] Turkbey B(2013)Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review Eur Urol 63 125-140

[7] Heijnsdijk EA(2013)Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer: initial clinical experience with real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance and magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion Urology 81 1372-1378

[8] Wever EM(2015)Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer BJU Int 116 873-879

[9] Auvinen A(2013)Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy Eur Urol 64 713-719

[10] Kaufmann S(2013)Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group Eur Urol 64 544-552

[1] Center MM(2012)International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates Eur Urol 61 1079-1092

[2] Jemal A(2015)Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 313 390-397

[3] Lortet-Tieulent J(2012)Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening N Engl J Med 367 595-605

[4] Siddiqui MM(2015)Direct comparison of targeted MRI-guided biopsy with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in patients with previous negative prostate biopsies Urol Int 94 319-325

[5] Rais-Bahrami S(2015)Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients Eur Urol 67 787-794

[6] Turkbey B(2013)Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review Eur Urol 63 125-140

[7] Heijnsdijk EA(2013)Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer: initial clinical experience with real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance and magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion Urology 81 1372-1378

[8] Wever EM(2015)Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer BJU Int 116 873-879

[9] Auvinen A(2013)Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy Eur Urol 64 713-719

[10] Kaufmann S(2013)Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group Eur Urol 64 544-552