Temporal fate specification and neural progenitor competence during development

被引:0
作者
Minoree Kohwi
Chris Q. Doe
机构
[1] Institute of Neuroscience,
[2] Institute of Molecular Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute,undefined
[3] University of Oregon,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Neuroscience | 2013年 / 14卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The vast neural diversity in the CNS is generated from a small pool of progenitors that produce distinct cell types in a specific order. The generation of a particular cell type depends on the spatial position of the progenitor (spatial patterning) as well as changing intrinsic and extrinsic signals (temporal patterning).Neural progenitors sequentially express a series of transcription factors, which specify the fate of the progeny on the basis of birth timing (temporal identity). Distinct neural lineages can use the same temporal-identity factor to specify different progeny fates.Distinct temporal-patterning cues in the neural progenitor and the progeny can act combinatorially to increase neural diversity.Studies of neurogenesis in multiple organisms show that the molecular players involved in temporal fate specification are highly conserved.In addition to the sequential specification of distinct cell fates, neural stem cells undergo dynamic changes in competence states, such that a given cell type can be specified during only a limited window of development. Thus, the specification of a particular cell fate requires the progenitor to be in the correct competence state to respond appropriately to the cell-fate-determining factors.Emerging evidence indicates that global changes in chromatin architecture play an important part in the regulation of competence states.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 838
页数:15
相关论文
共 332 条
[71]  
Benito-Sipos J(2013)Reconstruction of rat retinal progenitor cell lineages Cell Rep. 4 492-392
[72]  
Kao CF(2008) reveals a surprising degree of stochasticity in cell fate decisions Neuron 57 364-1765
[73]  
Yu HH(2008)Stochastic mechanisms of cell fate specification that yield random or robust outcomes J. Neurosci. 28 622-19078
[74]  
He Y(2005)Direction-selective retinal ganglion cells arise from molecularly specified multipotential progenitors Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 17184-E725
[75]  
Kao JC(2008)Transcription factor Olig2 defines subpopulations of retinal progenitor cells biased toward specific cell fates Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 11382-52
[76]  
Lee T(2005)The determination of projection neuron identity in the developing cerebral cortex Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 17792-222
[77]  
Zhu S(2008)Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex Neuron 57 378-25
[78]  
Lin S(2002)Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases Genes Dev. 16 1760-1689
[79]  
Kao CF(2012)Distinct behaviors of neural stem and progenitor cells underlie cortical neurogenesis Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 19071-265
[80]  
Yu HH(2013)Molecular logic of neocortical projection neuron specification, development and diversity Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110 E716-483