Lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of survival in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:0
作者
Ying L. Liu
Anurag Saraf
Shing M. Lee
Xiaobo Zhong
Hanina Hibshoosh
Kevin Kalinsky
Eileen P. Connolly
机构
[1] Columbia University Medical Center,Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital
[2] Columbia University Medical Center,Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital
[3] Columbia University School of Medicine,Department of Biostatistics
[4] Columbia University Medical Center,Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, New York Presbyterian Hospital
[5] Columbia University Medical Center,Department of Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2016年 / 157卷
关键词
Lymphovascular invasion; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Breast cancer; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Various prognostic indicators have been investigated in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-treated invasive breast cancer (BC). Our study examines if lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an independent predictor of survival in women receiving NAC. We performed a retrospective analysis in 166 women with operable invasive BC who underwent adriamycin- and taxane-based NAC between 2000 and 2013. The presence of LVI was noted in breast excisions following NAC. Associations between progression-free and overall survival and LVI and other clinicopathologic variables were assessed. Median follow-up was 31 months (range 1.4–153 months) with a total of 56 events and 24 deaths from any cause. LVI was found in 74 of 166 patients (45 %). In univariate analysis, the presence of LVI was associated with worse progression-free survival (HR 3.37, 95 % CI 1.87–6.06, p < 0.01) and overall survival (HR 4.35, 95 % CI 1.61–11.79, p < 0.01). In multivariate models adjusting for breast cancer subtype, LVI was significantly associated with a decrease in progression-free survival (HR 3.76, 95 % CI 2.07–6.83, p < 0.01) and overall survival (HR 5.70, 95 % CI 2.08–15.64, p < 0.01). When stratified by subtype, those with hormone receptor or HER2-positive BCs with no LVI had the most favorable progression-free and overall survival. Those with both LVI and triple-negative BC had the worst progression-free and overall survival. LVI is an important prognostic marker and is associated with worse clinical outcome in breast cancer patients receiving NAC.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 564
页数:9
相关论文
共 382 条
[1]  
Ragaz J(1986)Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy for breast cancer: outline of the British Columbia Trial Recent Results Cancer Res 103 85-94
[2]  
Ragaz J(1985)Preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (neoadjuvant) for carcinoma of the breast: rationale and safety report Recent Results Cancer Res 98 99-105
[3]  
Baird R(2008)Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease J Clin Oncol 26 814-819
[4]  
Rebbeck P(2006)Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update J Clin Oncol 24 1940-1949
[5]  
Goldie A(2009)Tumor histology in lymph vessels and lymph nodes for the accurate prediction of outcome among breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy Cancer Sci 100 1823-1833
[6]  
Coldman A(2001)Chemotherapy response of breast cancer depends on HER-2 status and anthracycline dose intensity in the neoadjuvant setting Clin Cancer Res 7 1577-1581
[7]  
Spinelli J(2011)Clinical and pathological features of breast cancer associated with the pathological complete response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy Oncology 81 30-38
[8]  
Gralow JR(2002)Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer Br J Cancer 86 1041-1046
[9]  
Burstein HJ(2003)Roles of the pathologist in neoadjuvant chemotherapy: evaluation of response, prognostic and predictive factors Ann Pathol 23 555-563
[10]  
Wood W(2006)Pathological response to preoperative concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for breast cancer: results of a phase II study Eur J Cancer 42 2286-2295