Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS)

被引:1
作者
Ozlem Yilmaz
Ebru Demir Gul
Hatice Bodur
机构
[1] Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
来源
Rheumatology International | 2014年 / 34卷
关键词
Reliability; Validity; Turkish; HOOS-PS; Hip osteoarthritis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study is to adapt the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) to Turkish language and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version in patients with primary hip osteoarthritis. After the translation from the source language (English) to the target language (Turkish), synthesis, back translation, revision, and pretest stages were done. Next, 50 patients with primary hip osteoarthritis were asked to fill out the Turkish version of the HOOS-PS two times with one week interval. Internal consistency was tested using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test–retest reliability was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was investigated by comparing the results of the HOOS-PS and WOMAC, Lequesne questionnaries using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was good with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.778 (>0.7) and ICC was 0.911 (>0.7). Both scores verify that the Turkish HOOS-PS is a reliable tool. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between the HOOS-PS and overall WOMAC (r = 0.653), WOMAC physical functions (r = 0.626), WOMAC pain (r = 0.629) subscales, overall Lequesne (r = 0.650), and Lequesne daily living activities (r = 0.620) subscales were high (r > 0.6), and moderate correlations were found between the HOOS-PS and WOMAC stiffness (r = 0.511), Lequesne pain (r = 0.569), and Lequesne-walking distance (r = 0.578) subscales (0.6 > r > 0.2), thus providing proof for the validity of the Turkish form. The Turkish HOOS-PS was found to be reliable and valid for patients with primary hip osteoarthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:6
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Klässbo M(2003)Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Scand J Rheumatol 32 46-51
  • [2] Larsson E(2008)The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative Osteoarthr Cartil 16 551-559
  • [3] Mannevik E(2009)Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis Osteoarthr Cartil 17 843-847
  • [4] Davis AM(2003)Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)–validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement BMC Musculoskelet Disord 30 10-1432
  • [5] Perruccio AV(1993)Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed quidelines J Clin Epidemiol 46 1417-3191
  • [6] Canizares M(2000)Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures Spine 25 3186-514
  • [7] Tennant A(1991)The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip Arthritis Rheum 34 505-791
  • [8] Hawker GA(1997)Radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis J Rheumatol 24 786-1840
  • [9] Conaghan PG(1988)Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol 15 1833-108
  • [10] Roos EM(1988)Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis J Orthop Rheumatol 1 95-33