Inactivation of CRISPR-Cas systems by anti-CRISPR proteins in diverse bacterial species

被引:0
作者
Pawluk A. [1 ]
Staals R.H.J. [2 ]
Taylor C. [2 ]
Watson B.N.J. [2 ]
Saha S. [3 ]
Fineran P.C. [2 ]
Maxwell K.L. [4 ]
Davidson A.R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, M5S 1A8, ON
[2] Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin
[3] Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, M5S 1A8, ON
[4] Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, M5S 3E1, ON
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.85
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CRISPR-Cas systems provide sequence-specific adaptive immunity against foreign nucleic acids1,2. They are present in approximately half of all sequenced prokaryotes3 and are expected to constitute a major barrier to horizontal gene transfer. We previously described nine distinct families of proteins encoded in Pseudomonas phage genomes that inhibit CRISPR-Cas function4,5. We have developed a bioinformatic approach that enabled us to discover additional anti-CRISPR proteins encoded in phages and other mobile genetic elements of diverse bacterial species. We show that five previously undiscovered families of anti-CRISPRs inhibit the type I-F CRISPR-Cas systems of both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pectobacterium atrosepticum, and a dual specificity anti-CRISPR inactivates both type I-F and I-E CRISPR-Cas systems. Mirroring the distribution of the CRISPR-Cas systems they inactivate, these anti-CRISPRs were found in species distributed broadly across the phylum Proteobacteria. Importantly, anti-CRISPRs originating from species with divergent type I-F CRISPR-Cas systems were able to inhibit the two systems we tested, highlighting their broad specificity. These results suggest that all type I-F CRISPR-Cas systems are vulnerable to inhibition by anti-CRISPRs. Given the widespread occurrence and promiscuous activity of the anti-CRISPRs described here, we propose that anti-CRISPRs play an influential role in facilitating the movement of DNA between prokaryotes by breaching the barrier imposed by CRISPR-Cas systems. © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Brouns S.J., Et al., Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes, Science, 321, pp. 960-964, (2008)
  • [2] Barrangou R., Et al., CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes, Science, 315, pp. 1709-1712, (2007)
  • [3] Makarova K.S., Et al., An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-cas systems, Nature Rev. Microbiol., 13, pp. 722-736, (2015)
  • [4] Bondy-Denomy J., Pawluk A., Maxwell K.L., Davidson A.R., Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system, Nature, 493, pp. 429-432, (2013)
  • [5] Pawluk A., Bondy-Denomy J., Cheung V.H., Maxwell K.L., Davidson A.R., A new group of phage anti-CRISPR genes inhibits the type I-E CRISPR-cas system of pseudomonas aeruginosa, MBio, 5, (2014)
  • [6] Doolittle W.F., Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree, Science, 284, pp. 2124-2129, (1999)
  • [7] Gogarten J.P., Doolittle W.F., Lawrence J.G., Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer, Mol. Biol. Evol., 19, pp. 2226-2238, (2002)
  • [8] Marraffini L.A., Sontheimer E.J., CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA, Science, 322, pp. 1843-1845, (2008)
  • [9] Garneau J.E., Et al., The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA, Nature, 468, pp. 67-71, (2010)
  • [10] Jore M.M., Et al., Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by cascade, Nature Struct. Mol. Biol., 18, pp. 529-536, (2011)