Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Mandibular Bone Regenerated By Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:0
作者
Elias Kontogiorgos
Mohammed E. Elsalanty
Uriel Zapata
Ibrahim Zakhary
William W. Nagy
Paul C. Dechow
Lynne A. Opperman
机构
[1] Texas A&M Health Science Center,Department of Biomedical Sciences
[2] Baylor College of Dentistry,Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry
[3] Georgia Health Science University,Department of Restorative Sciences
[4] Texas A&M Health Science Center,Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica
[5] Baylor College of Dentistry,undefined
[6] Universidad Eafit,undefined
来源
Calcified Tissue International | 2011年 / 89卷
关键词
Micro-computed tomography; Distraction device; Bone transport; Bone regeneration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the structure and material properties of native mandibular bone and those of early regenerate bone, produced by bone transport distraction osteogenesis. Ten adult foxhounds were divided into two groups of five animals each. In all animals, a 3- to 4-cm defect was created on one side of the mandible. A bone transport reconstruction plate, consisting of a reconstruction plate with an attached intraoral transport unit, was utilized to stabilize the mandible and regenerate bone at a rate of 1 mm/day. After the distraction period was finished, the animals were killed at 6 and 12 weeks of consolidation. Micro-computed tomography was used to assess the morphometric and structural indices of regenerate bone and matching bone from the unoperated contralateral side. Significant new bone was formed within the defect in the 6- and 12-week groups. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between mandibular regenerated and native bone were found in regard to bone volume fraction, mineral density, bone surface ratio, trabecular thickness, trabecular separation, and connectivity density, which increased from 12 to 18 weeks of consolidation. We showed that regenerated bone is still mineralizing and that native bone appears denser because of a thick outer layer of cortical bone that is not yet formed in the regenerate. However, the regenerate showed a significantly higher number of thicker trabeculae.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]  
Codivilla A(2008)The classic: on the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. 1905 Clin Orthop Relat Res 466 2903-2909
[2]  
Ilizarov GA(1971)Basic principles of transosseous compression and distraction osteosynthesis [in Russian] Ortop Traumatol Protez 32 7-15
[3]  
Carls FR(1998)Seven years clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26 197-208
[4]  
Sailer HF(1992)Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction Plast Reconstr Surg 89 1-10
[5]  
McCarthy JG(1995)Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies Plast Reconstr Surg 96 825-840
[6]  
Schreiber J(2006)Quality and quantity of bone following alveolar distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible Clin Oral Implants Res 17 394-402
[7]  
Karp N(2001)Vertical distraction osteogenesis of edentulous ridges for improvement of oral implant positioning: a clinical report of preliminary results Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 43-51
[8]  
Thorne CH(2009)The Endo-Distractor for preimplant mandibular regeneration Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 110 17-26
[9]  
Grayson BH(2007)Reconstruction of large mandibular bone and soft-tissue defect using bone transport distraction osteogenesis J Craniofac Surg 18 1397-1402
[10]  
Molina F(2004)Use of a plate-guided distraction device for transport distraction osteogenesis of the mandible J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 412-420