Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Interacts with Ambiguity During Sentence Comprehension

被引:0
作者
Sarah E. Key-DeLyria
Todd Bodner
Lori J. P. Altmann
机构
[1] Portland State University,Speech and Hearing Sciences Department
[2] Portland State University,Department of Psychology
[3] University of Florida,Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences
来源
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research | 2019年 / 48卷
关键词
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation; Sentence processing; Shallow processing; Working memory; Executive function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conventional opinion about using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) for examining sentence comprehension maintains that RSVP taxes working memory (WM), which probably affects sentence processing. However, most RSVP studies only infer the involvement of WM. Other cognitive resources, such as cognitive control or vocabulary may also impact sentence comprehension and interact with RSVP. Further, sentence ambiguity is predicted to interact with RSVP and cognitive resources to impact sentence comprehension. To test these relationships, participants read ambiguous and unambiguous sentences using RSVP and Whole-Sentence presentation, followed by comprehension questions that were targeted to the ambiguous region of the sentences. Presentation type and ambiguity interacted to affect RT such that the effect of RSVP was exaggerated for ambiguous sentences. RT effects were moderated by WM and vocabulary. WM and cognitive control affected accuracy. Findings are discussed in light of depth of processing and the impact of cognitive resources on sentence comprehension.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 682
页数:17
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Baddeley A(2003)Working memory and language: An overview Journal of Communication Disorders 36 189-208
[2]  
Braze D(2016)Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading Reading and Writing 29 435-451
[3]  
Katz L(1999)Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 77-94
[4]  
Magnuson JS(2005)The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension Memory 13 403-413
[5]  
Einar Mencl W(2013)Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20 243-268
[6]  
Tabor W(2001)Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger Cognitive Psychology 42 368-407
[7]  
Van Dyke JA(2010)Effects of plausibility on structural priming Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36 538-544
[8]  
Caplan D(2005)Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 769-786
[9]  
Waters GS(1980)Individual differences in working memory and reading ournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 450-466
[10]  
Caplan D(2017)Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity: An individual differences investigation The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 1263-1281