Preferences for Professional Development in Science Among Pre- and In-service Primary Teachers: a Best–Worst Scaling Approach

被引:0
作者
Paul F. Burke
Tracey-Ann Palmer
Kimberley Pressick-Kilborn
机构
[1] University of Technology Sydney,Faculty of Business
[2] UTS Business,Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
[3] University of Technology Sydney (UTS),undefined
[4] UTS Business,undefined
来源
Research in Science Education | 2022年 / 52卷
关键词
Teacher training; School teachers; Child; Students; Staff development; In-service training; Curriculum; Primary school, elementary school;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined the preferences for professional development (PD) in primary (elementary) science among pre-service teachers (PSTs) and in-service teachers (ISTs). The contribution of the study is its focus on quantifying the relative importance of factors that were significant for teachers by using best–worst scaling methodology. Rather than considering potential factors in isolation, teachers traded off among content areas of PD, thereby revealing which aspects they most preferred. A comparison of PSTs and ISTs indicated that both sought greater guidance on adapting their science teaching for multi-age classes and on strategies to engage students in activity-based science. Relative to the PSTs, the ISTs reported less need for PD opportunities that emphasized collaboration and networks, and science pedagogy and content. Both groups indicated that they would most benefit from PD that focused on building their knowledge and strategies for teaching guided inquiry and investigation- and activity-based science. The findings offer critical insights into the broader improvement of PD of teachers in the context of science education.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1806
页数:15
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Alake-Tuenter E(2012)Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards International Journal of Science Education 34 2609-2640
[2]  
Biemans HJ(2000)Designing professional development that works Educational Leadership 57 28-33
[3]  
Tobi H(2004)Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain Educational Researcher 33 3-15
[4]  
Wals AE(2010)Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development International Encyclopedia of Education 7 548-556
[5]  
Oosterheert I(2010)Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections Teaching and Teacher Education 26 599-607
[6]  
Mulder M(2014)The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications Science and Children 51 10-13
[7]  
Birman BF(2013)Inquiry-based professional development: What does it take to support teachers in learning about inquiry and nature of science? International Journal of Science Education 35 1947-1978
[8]  
Desimone L(2013)Profiling teachers’ continuing professional development and the relation with their beliefs about learning and teaching Teaching and Teacher Education 33 78-89
[9]  
Porter AC(2009)Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures Educational Researcher 38 181-199
[10]  
Garet MS(2006)Comparing methods of brand image measurement International Journal of Market Research 48 681-698