Docking-based virtual screening of TβR1 inhibitors: evaluation of pose prediction and scoring functions

被引:0
作者
Shuai Wang
Jun-Hao Jiang
Ruo-Yu Li
Ping Deng
机构
[1] Chongqing Medical University,College of Pharmacy
来源
BMC Chemistry | / 14卷
关键词
Docking methods; Scoring functions; Molecular docking-based virtual screening; Transforming growth factor β; Inhibitor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To improve the reliability of virtual screening for transforming growth factor-beta type 1 receptor (TβR1) inhibitors, 2 docking methods and 11 scoring functions in Discovery Studio software were evaluated and validated in this study. LibDock and CDOCKER protocols were performed on a test set of 24 TβR1 protein–ligand complexes. Based on the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values (in Å) between the docking poses and co-crystal conformations, the CDOCKER protocol can be efficiently applied to obtain more accurate dockings in medium-size virtual screening experiments of TβR1, with a successful docking rate of 95%. A dataset including 281 known active and 8677 inactive ligands was used to determine the best scoring function. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the performance of scoring functions in attributing best scores to active than inactive ligands. The results show that Ludi 1, PMF, Ludi 2, Ludi 3, PMF04, PLP1, PLP2, LigScore2, Jain and LigScore1 are better scoring functions than the random distribution model, with AUC of 0.864, 0.856, 0.842, 0.812, 0.776, 0.774, 0.769, 0.762, 0.697 and 0.660, respectively. Based on the pairwise comparison of ROC curves, Ludi 1 and PMF were chosen as the best scoring functions for virtual screening of TβR1 inhibitors. Further enrichment factors (EF) analysis also supports PMF and Ludi 1 as the top two scoring functions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 284 条
[1]  
Zhong F(2018)Artificial intelligence in drug design Sci China Life Sci 61 1191-1204
[2]  
Xing J(2019)Identification of novel PI3Kδ selective inhibitors by SVM-based multistage virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations Int J Mol Sci 20 6000-590
[3]  
Li X(2019)Key topics in molecular docking for drug design Int J Mol Sci 20 4574-282
[4]  
Liu X(2019)Computational simulations identified two candidate inhibitors of Cdk5/p25 to sbrogate tau-associated neurological disorders Comput Struct Biotechnol J 17 579-600
[5]  
Fu Z(2011)Similarity searching WIRES Comput Mol Sci 1 260-679
[6]  
Xiong Z(2017)Identification of direct activator of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) by structure-based virtual screening and molecular docking approach Int J Mol Sci 18 1408-2303
[7]  
Lu D(2013)ID-Score: a new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions J Chem Inf Model 53 592-2125
[8]  
Wu X(2017)Discovery of new SIRT2 inhibitors by utilizing a consensus docking/scoring strategy and structure-activity relationship analysis J Chem Inf Model 57 669-26
[9]  
Zhao J(2003)Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking J Med Chem 46 2287-1034
[10]  
Tan X(2010)Evaluation of the performance of four molecular docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes J Comput Chem 31 2109-1750