The origin of Rhinocerotoidea and phylogeny of Ceratomorpha (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)

被引:0
作者
Bin Bai
Jin Meng
Chi Zhang
Yan-Xin Gong
Yuan-Qing Wang
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology
[2] CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment,Division of Paleontology
[3] American Museum of Natural History,Earth and Environmental Sciences, Graduate Center
[4] City University of New York,College of Earth and Planetary Sciences
[5] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
来源
Communications Biology | / 3卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rhinoceroses have been considered to have originated from tapiroids in the middle Eocene; however, the transition remains controversial, and the first unequivocal rhinocerotoids appeared about 4 Ma later than the earliest tapiroids of the Early Eocene. Here we describe 5 genera and 6 new species of rhinoceroses recently discovered from the early Eocene to the early middle Eocene deposits of the Erlian Basin of Inner Mongolia, China. These new materials represent the earliest members of rhinocerotoids, forstercooperiids, and/or hyrachyids, and bridge the evolutionary gap between the early Eocene ceratomorphs and middle Eocene rhinocerotoids. The phylogenetic analyses using parsimony and Bayesian inference methods support their affinities with rhinocerotoids, and also illuminate the phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of Ceratomorpha, although some discrepancies are present between the two criteria. The nearly contemporary occurrence of various rhinocerotoids indicates that the divergence of different rhinocerotoid groups occurred no later than the late early Eocene, which is soon after the split between the rhinocerotoids and the tapiroids in the early early Eocene. However, the Bayesian tip-dating estimate suggests that the divergence of different ceratomorph groups occurred in the middle Paleocene.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 149 条
  • [71] Murphey PC(2010)Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology J. Theor. Biol. 267 396-249
  • [72] Townsend KB(2016)Giant taxon-character matrices: quality of character constructions remains critical regardless of size Syst. Biol. 65 228-undefined
  • [73] Friscia AR(undefined)Likelihood approximations of implied weights parsimony can be selected over the Mk model by the Akaike information criterion undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [74] Evanoff E(undefined)An algorithm for morphological phylogenetic analysis with inapplicable data undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [75] Huang X(undefined)Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [76] Wang J(undefined)TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [77] Chow MC(undefined)TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [78] Qi T(undefined)Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [79] Bai B(undefined)The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [80] Wang Y(undefined)MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space undefined undefined undefined-undefined