An automated software reliability prediction system for safety critical software

被引:0
作者
Xiang Li
Chetan Mutha
Carol S. Smidts
机构
[1] Nuclear Engineering Program at The Ohio State University,
[2] Oblon,undefined
[3] McClelland,undefined
[4] Maier & Neustadt,undefined
[5] LLP,undefined
[6] Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University,undefined
来源
Empirical Software Engineering | 2016年 / 21卷
关键词
Software reliability; Reliability modeling; Experimental validation; Operational profile; Finite state machine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Software reliability is one of the most important software quality indicators. It is concerned with the probability that the software can execute without any unintended behavior in a given environment. In previous research we developed the Reliability Prediction System (RePS) methodology to predict the reliability of safety critical software such as those used in the nuclear industry. A RePS methodology relates the software engineering measures to software reliability using various models, and it was found that RePS’s using Extended Finite State Machine (EFSM) models and fault data collected through various software engineering measures possess the most satisfying prediction capability. In this research the EFSM-based RePS methodology is improved and implemented into a tool called Automated Reliability Prediction System (ARPS). The features of the ARPS tool are introduced with a simple case study. An experiment using human subjects was also conducted to evaluate the usability of the tool, and the results demonstrate that the ARPS tool can indeed help the analyst apply the EFSM-based RePS methodology with less number of errors and lower error criticality.
引用
收藏
页码:2413 / 2455
页数:42
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Huang F(1975)A theory of software reliability and its application IEEE Trans Softw Eng 1 312-327
[2]  
Liu B(2005)Performance analysis of software reliability growth models with testing-effort and change-point J Syst Softw 76 181-194
[3]  
Fenton N(2007)An assessment of testing-effort dependent software reliability growth models IEEE Trans Reliab 56 198-211
[4]  
Neil M(2013)Study on the correlations between program metrics and defect rate by a controlled experiment Int J Softw Eng 7 114-120
[5]  
Langseth H(1999)A critique of software defect prediction models IEEE Trans Softw Eng 25 675-689
[6]  
Portinale L(2007)Bayesian networks in reliability Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 92-108
[7]  
Gokhale S(2006)Analytical models for architecture-based software reliability prediction: a unification framework IEEE Trans Reliab 55 578-590
[8]  
Trivedi K(2000)SREPT: software reliability estimation and prediction tool Perform Eval 39 37-60
[9]  
Ramani S(2006)A continuous-time Bayesian network reliability modeling, and analysis framework IEEE Trans Reliab 55 86-97
[10]  
Gokhale S(1993)Operational profiles in software-reliability engineering Software, IEEE 10 14-32