Polymorphisms in the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 gene and acute rejection risk in transplant recipients

被引:0
作者
Cheng-lin Zhu
Qiang Huang
Chen-hai Liu
Fang Xie
机构
[1] Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University,Department of General Surgery
来源
Molecular Biology Reports | 2012年 / 39卷
关键词
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4; Polymorphism; Acute rejection; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) gene polymorphisms have been reported to influence the risk for acute rejection (AR) in transplant recipients. However, the results still remain controversial and ambiguous. The objective of the current study was to conduct a meta-analysis investigating the association between polymorphisms in the CTLA-4 gene and the risk of AR in transplant recipients. Electronic searches for all publications were conducted on associations between this variant and acute rejection in Medline and Embase databases through November 2011. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the strength of the association. Three polymorphisms (+49 adenine/guanine [+49A/G], −318 cytosine/thymine [−318C/T], and the +6230G/A polymorphism [CT60]) in 18 case–control studies from ten articles were analyzed. This meta-analysis included 2,081 cases of transplant recipients in which 813 cases developed AR and 1,268 cases did not develop AR. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant association between the risk of AR and the +49A/G polymorphism or the −318C/T polymorphism (+49A/G: OR = 0.876, 95 % CI = 0.650–1.180 for GG vs. AA; OR = 1.121, 95 % CI = 0.911–1.379 for AG + GG vs. AA; −318C/T: OR = 0.397, 95 % CI = 0.138–1.143 for TT vs. CC; OR = 0.987, 95 %CI = 0.553–1.760 for CT + TT vs. CC). However, individuals who carried CT60 A allele might have a decreased risk of AR (AA vs. GG OR = 0.535, 95 % CI = 0.340–0.841, A vs. G OR = 0.759, 95 % CI = 0.612–0.914) in liver transplant recipients among Europeans, but because only two studies were included, so the result should be caution. In further stratified analyses for the +49A/G and the −318C/T polymorphisms, no obvious significant associations were found in subgroups of renal transplant recipients and Europeans, a reduced incidence of acute rejection was observed in liver transplant recipients that are homogenous for +49G (OR = 0.638, 95 % CI = 0.427–0.954 for GG vs. AA/AG), while this has not been observed in renal transplant recipients. Overall this meta-analysis suggests that +49A/G and the −318C/T polymorphisms in CTLA-4 may be not associated with the risk of rejection after organ transplantation, but CTLA +49A/G and +6230G/A polymorphisms may be associated with acute rejection after liver transplantation, not after renal transplantation. In future, more studies should be included to evaluate the association between +6230G/A polymorphism and AR risk.
引用
收藏
页码:8701 / 8708
页数:7
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Yu AS(2002)Liver transplantation: involving patient selection criteria Can J Gastroenterol 15 729-738
[2]  
Ahmed A(1998)The role of T-cell costimulatory activation pathways in transplant rejection N Engl J Med 338 1813-1821
[3]  
Keeffe EB(2003)Genetic variability and transplantation Curr Opin Urol 13 81-89
[4]  
Sayegh MH(2008)Functional genetic variations in cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and susceptibility to multiple types of cancer Cancer Res 68 7025-7034
[5]  
Turka LA(2010)CTLA-4 +49A > G polymorphism is associated with the risk but not with the progression of colorectal cancer in Chinese Int J Colorectal Dis 25 39-45
[6]  
Marder B(2004)Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 gene in breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 86 1-7
[7]  
Schroppel B(2001)CTLA-4 gene expression is influenced by promoter and exon 1 polymorphisms Genes Immun 2 145-152
[8]  
Murphy B(2003)Association of the T-cell regulatory gene CTLA4 with susceptibility to autoimmune disease Nature 423 506-511
[9]  
Sun T(1954)The combination of estimates from different experiments Biometrics 10 101-129
[10]  
Zhou Y(1959)Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease J Nat Cancer Inst 22 719-748