Effect of the Neurolinguistic Approach on EFL Learners’ Implicit and Explicit Grammar Knowledge: The Present Perfect Tense in Focus神經語言學教學法對EFL學習者隱性與顯性文法知識的影響: 聚焦現在完成式

被引:0
作者
Marzieh Bagherkazemi
Soodeh Zahed Shekarabi
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch),Department of English Language Teaching
来源
English Teaching & Learning | 2023年 / 47卷
关键词
Explicit knowledge; Grammaticality judgment test; Implicit knowledge; Metalinguistic knowledge test; Neurolinguistic approach; 顯性知識; 文法判斷測驗; 隱性知識; 後設語言知識測驗; 神經語言學教學法;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The neurolinguistic approach (NLA) is an intensive sentence-based pedagogy designed specifically for low-proficiency learners. It places a premium on orality and the development of both internal and external grammars through a project-based literacy loop. The present study employed a pretest–posttest control group design to investigate the effect of NLA on conveniently sampled pre-intermediate EFL learners’ implicit and explicit knowledge of the English present perfect tense. Treatment for the experimental group (EG; N = 25) spanned three 1.5-h project-based sessions, with orality marking the beginning and end of each session and reading, rule induction, and writing as intermediary phases. The control group (CG; N = 24), on the other hand, was exposed to tense-rich reading input, followed by rule explanation and follow-up communicative tasks. Implicit knowledge was measured through a timed grammaticality judgment test and an interview, and explicit knowledge was measured through an untimed grammaticality judgment test and a metalinguistic knowledge test. ANOVA results showed CG’s and EG’s comparable significant gains on explicit knowledge measures and only EG’s significant gain on implicit knowledge measures. The findings substantiate NLA’s potential for the development of both internal and external grammars and have implications for grammar instruction.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 467
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ellis R(2002)Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of research Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 223-236
[2]  
Ellis R(2006)Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective TESOL Quarterly 40 83-107
[3]  
Germain C(2013)For a new approach to teaching grammar in the language classroom - Grammar and the neurolinguistic approach (NLA) Revue Japonaise De Didactique Du Français 8 172-187
[4]  
Germain C(2015)Evaluation of the neurolinguistic approach (NLA) for first- and second-year Chinese learners Recheches en didactique des langues et des cultures, Les Cahiers de l’Acedle 12 1-449
[5]  
Liang M(2013)The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35 423-430
[6]  
Ricordel I(2004)Intensive French and intensive English: Similarities and differences The Canadian Modern Language Rreview 60 409-297
[7]  
Gutiérrez X(2015)Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37 269-1147
[8]  
Germain C(2020)Neuro-linguistic programming and its implications for English language learners and teachers Theory and Practice in Language Studies 10 1141-103
[9]  
Lighbown P(1998)Neurolinguistic applications to SLA classroom instruction: A review of the issues with a focus on Danesi’s bimodality Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education 3 91-528
[10]  
Netten J(2000)Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis Language Learning 50 417-207