Neurological complications in adult spinal deformity surgery

被引:26
作者
Iorio J.A. [1 ]
Reid P. [1 ]
Kim H.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, 10021, NY
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Nerve injury; Neurological complications; Osteotomies; Revision; Surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s12178-016-9350-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The number of surgeries performed for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has been increasing due to an aging population, longer life expectancy, and studies supporting an improvement in health-related quality of life scores after operative intervention. However, medical and surgical complication rates remain high, and neurological complications such as spinal cord injury and motor deficits can be especially debilitating to patients. Several independent factors potentially influence the likelihood of neurological complications including surgical approach (anterior, lateral, or posterior), use of osteotomies, thoracic hyperkyphosis, spinal region, patient characteristics, and revision surgery status. The majority of ASD surgeries are performed by a posterior approach to the thoracic and/or lumbar spine, but anterior and lateral approaches are commonly performed and are associated with unique neural complications such as femoral nerve palsy and lumbar plexus injuries. Spinal morphology, such as that of hyperkyphosis, has been reported to be a risk factor for complications in addition to three-column osteotomies, which are often utilized to correct large deformities. Additionally, revision surgeries are common in ASD and these patients are at an increased risk of procedure-related complications and nervous system injury. Patient selection, surgical technique, and use of intraoperative neuromonitoring may reduce the incidence of complications and optimize outcomes. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Smith J.S., Shaffrey C.I., Fu K.M., Et al., Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the adult spinal deformity patient, Neurosurg Clin N Am, 24, 2, pp. 143-156, (2013)
[2]  
Schwab F., Dubey A., Gamez L., Et al., Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 9, pp. 1082-1085, (2005)
[3]  
Ailon T., Smith J.S., Shaffrey C.I., Et al., Degenerative spinal deformity, Neurosurgery, 77, pp. S75-S91, (2015)
[4]  
Smith J.S., Shaffrey C.I., Glassman S.D., Et al., Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 36, 10, pp. 817-824, (2011)
[5]  
Glassman S.D., Bridwell K., Dimar J.R., Et al., The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 18, pp. 2024-2029, (2005)
[6]  
Lafage V., Schwab F., Patel A., Et al., Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 34, 17, pp. E599-E606, (2009)
[7]  
Schwab F.J., Blondel B., Bess S., Et al., Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 38, 13, pp. E803-E812, (2013)
[8]  
Terran J., Schwab F., Shaffrey C.I., Et al., The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort, Neurosurgery, 73, 4, pp. 559-568, (2013)
[9]  
Berjano P., Lamartina C., Classification of degenerative segment disease in adults with deformity of the lumbar or thoracolumbar spine, Eur Spine J, 23, 9, pp. 1815-1824, (2014)
[10]  
Neurosurgery, (2015)