Land-Surface Heterogeneity Effects in the Planetary Boundary Layer

被引:0
作者
Brian P. Reen
David R. Stauffer
Kenneth J. Davis
机构
[1] The Pennsylvania State University,Department of Meteorology
[2] United States Army Research Laboratory,Battlefield Environment Division
来源
Boundary-Layer Meteorology | 2014年 / 150卷
关键词
Atmospheric boundary layer; Data assimilation; Land-surface heterogeneity; Land-surface model; Mesoscale modelling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We investigate the cumulative added value of assimilating temperature, moisture, and wind observations in the three-dimensional non-hydrostatic Fifth-Generation Pennsylvania State University/National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model MM5 and use these forecasts to analyze the relationship between surface forcing and planetary boundary-layer (PBL) depth. A data assimilation methodology focused on the surface and the PBL, previously tested in a one-dimensional version of MM5, is applied to 29 May, 6 June, and 7 June 2002 during the International H2O\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {H}_{2}\hbox {O}$$\end{document} Project over the Southern Great Plains. Model-predicted PBL depth is evaluated against PBL depth diagnosed from data across 4,800 km of airborne lidar data (flight tracks 100–300 km long). The forecast with data assimilation verifies better against observations and is thus used to investigate the environmental conditions that govern PBL depth. The spatial structure in PBL depth is found to be most affected by spatial variations in surface buoyancy flux and capping inversion strength. The spatial scales of surface flux forcing reflected in the PBL depth are found through Fourier analysis and multiresolution decomposition. Correlations are <0.50\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${<}0.50$$\end{document} at scales of 64 km or less and increase at larger scales for 29 May and 6 June, but on 7 June low correlations are found at all scales, possibly due to greater within-PBL wind speeds, a stronger capping inversion on this day, and clouds. The results suggest a minimum scale, a function of wind speed, below which heterogeneity in surface buoyancy fluxes is not reflected directly in PBL depth.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:30
相关论文
共 269 条
[1]  
Anderson MC(2004)A multiscale remote sensing model for disaggregating regional fluxes to micrometeorological scales J Hydrometeorol 5 343-363
[2]  
Norman JM(1990)Regional estimates of heat and evaporation fluxes over non-homogenous terrain. Examples from the HAPEX-MOBILHY program Boundary-Layer Meteorol 50 77-108
[3]  
Mecikalski JR(1998)Prelaunch characteristics of the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) on EOS-AM1 IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36 1088-1100
[4]  
Torn RD(2007)Intercomparison of water vapor data measured with lidar during IHOP\_2002. Part II: Airborne-to-airborne systems J Atmos Ocean Technol 24 22-39
[5]  
Kustas WP(1985)A simple scheme for objective analyses in curved flow Mon Weather Rev 113 1184-1198
[6]  
Basara JB(2001)Airborne lidar LEANDRE II for water-vapor profiling in the troposphere Appl Opt 40 3450-3475
[7]  
André JC(1983)Elevated mixed layers in the regional severe storm environment: conceptual model and case studies Mon Weather Rev 111 1453-1473
[8]  
Bougeault P(1994)The impact of land-surface wetness heterogeneity on mesoscale heat fluxes J Appl Meteorol 33 1323-1340
[9]  
Goutorbe J-P(1994)Impact of land-surface variability on local shallow convective cumulus and precipitation in large-scale models J Atmos Sci 23 1382-1401
[10]  
Barnes WL(2001)Coupling an advanced land surface—hydrology model with the Penn State—NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity Mon Weather Rev 129 569-585