A Retrospective Search for Predictors of Clinical Response to Selective Granulocyte and Monocyte Apheresis in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

被引:0
|
作者
Yasuo Suzuki
Naoki Yoshimura
Katsuyuki Fukuda
Koji Shirai
Yasushi Saito
Abbi R. Saniabadi
机构
[1] Toho University,Department of Internal Medicine, Sakura Hospital
[2] Chiba University School of Medicine,Department of Internal Medicine
[3] Social Insurance Chuo General Hospital,Sakura Hospital, Faculty of Medicine
[4] Chiba University School of Medicine,undefined
[5] Japan Immunoresearch Laboratories,undefined
[6] Toho University,undefined
来源
Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 2006年 / 51卷
关键词
Ulcerative colitis; First ulcerative colitis episode; 5-ASA; Selective granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis; Prednisolone; Clinical activity index; Endoscopic activity index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recently, selective granulocytapheresis (Adacolumn) has appeared as a new treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. This study sought to determine predictors of response to this new nonpharmacologic mode of therapy by retrospectively evaluating 28 patients who received granulocytapheresis after experiencing active ulcerative colitis (UC). Between April 2000 and March 2004, 28 consecutive patients received granulocytapheresis for active UC with the Adacolumn, which is filled with cellulose acetate beads as the column leukocytapheresis carriers; the carriers adsorb granulocytes, monocytes/macrophages, and a small fraction of lymphocytes (FcγR and complement receptors bearing leukocytes). Each patient could receive up to 10 Adacolumn sessions, at 2 sessions per week. In 2004, clinical response was retrospectively evaluated. Seven days after the last Adacolumn session, 20 of 28 patients had remission (colitis activity index [CAI] ≤4) including all 8 patients who had their first UC episode. The mean duration of UC in the 8 first episode cases was 3.4 months compared with 40.2 months for all 28 patients and 65.4 months for the 8 nonresponders. The response to Adacolumn was independent of basal CAI. The 8 nonresponders were given conventional medication (CM) or cyclosporine (CsA) if the former failed. Two responded to CM, 3 to CsA, and 3 underwent colectomy. First UC episode and short disease duration appear good predictors of response to granulocytapheresis. Selective granulocytapheresis might be an effective first-line treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2031 / 2038
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dose-Intensified Granulocyte-Monocyte Apheresis in Therapy Refractory Ulcerative Colitis
    Schultheiss, Caroline
    Weischenberg, Rene
    Herrmann, Andrea
    Haller, Bernhard
    Schmid, Roland M.
    Reindl, Wolfgang
    Huber, Wolfgang
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2015, 39 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [32] Changes in the plasma level of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in ulcerative colitis patients treated with selective granulocyte and monocyte apheresis
    Ohkawara, Tatsusya
    Takeda, Hiroshi
    Furukawa, Shigeru
    Kato, Mototsugu
    Shimizu, Yuichi
    Asaka, Masahiro
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 46 (21) : 1821 - 1822
  • [33] Granulocyte and monocyte apheresis therapy for patients with active ulcerative colitis associated with COVID-19
    Koroku, Miki
    Omori, Teppei
    Kambayashi, Harutaka
    Murasugi, Shun
    Kuriyama, Tomoko
    Ikarashi, Yuichi
    Yonezawa, Maria
    Arimura, Ken
    Karasawa, Kazunori
    Hanafusa, Norio
    Kawana, Masatoshi
    Tokushige, Katsutoshi
    INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2022, 20 (01) : 150 - 155
  • [34] Safety and efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis: A multicenter study
    Shimoyama, T
    Sawada, K
    Hiwatashi, N
    Sawada, T
    Matsueda, K
    Munakata, A
    Asakura, H
    Tanaka, T
    Kasukawa, R
    Kimura, K
    Suzuki, Y
    Nagamachi, Y
    Muto, T
    Nagawa, H
    Iizuka, B
    Baba, S
    Nasu, M
    Kataoka, T
    Kashiwagi, N
    Saniabadi, AR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2001, 16 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [35] Adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis versus prednisolone in patients with corticosteroid-dependent moderately severe ulcerative colitis
    Hanai, H
    Watanabe, F
    Yamada, M
    Sato, Y
    Takeuchi, K
    Iida, T
    Tozawa, K
    Tanaka, T
    Maruyama, Y
    Matsushita, I
    Iwaoka, Y
    Kikuch, K
    Saniabadi, AR
    DIGESTION, 2004, 70 (01) : 36 - 44
  • [36] Relevance of the Processed Blood Volume per Granulocyte and Monocyte Apheresis Session to its Clinical Efficacy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
    Kikuyama, Risa
    Fukunaga, Ken
    Kawai, Mikio
    Yokoyama, Yoko
    Kamikozuru, Koji
    Hida, Nobuyuki
    Ohda, Yoshio
    Takeda, Naohisa
    Yoshida, Koji
    Iimuro, Masaki
    Kato, Kyoichi
    Kono, Tomoaki
    Nogami, Koji
    Nagase, Kazuko
    Nakamura, Shiro
    Takei, Yoshiyuki
    Miwa, Hiroto
    Matsumoto, Takayuki
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2011, 15 (04) : 360 - 366
  • [37] Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis for the treatment of ulcerative colitis-is this the end of the road?
    Ghosh, Subrata
    Kaplan, Gilaad
    Panaccione, Remo
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 6 (01): : 6 - 7
  • [38] Plasma Level of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor during Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis
    Takeda, Hiroahi
    Nishise, Shoichi
    Fukui, Tadahisa
    Fujishima, Shoichiro
    Orii, Tomohiko
    Otake, Sayaka
    Sato, Takeshi
    Sasaki, Yu
    Kawata, Sumio
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 56 (90) : 348 - 351
  • [39] Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorption Apheresis Therapy Modulates Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cell Function in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
    Iwakami, Yuko
    Sakuraba, Atsushi
    Sato, Toshiro
    Takada, Yasuhiro
    Izumiya, Motoko
    Ichikawa, Hitoshi
    Hibi, Toshifumi
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2009, 13 (02) : 138 - 146
  • [40] Daily granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis: a prospective safety and feasibility study
    Takayuki Yamamoto
    Satoru Umegae
    Koichi Matsumoto
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 46