Influence of preoperative (hyperthermic) radiochemotherapy on manometric anal sphincter function in locally advanced rectal cancer

被引:8
作者
Fritzmann J. [1 ]
Hünerbein M. [1 ]
Slisow W. [1 ]
Gellermann J. [2 ]
Wust P. [2 ]
Raul B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Klin. F Chir. und Chir. Onkologie, Universitatsklinikum Charite, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
[2] Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Universitatsklinikum Charite, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
[3] Klin. F Chir. und Chir. Onkologie, Robert-Rössle-Klinik am MDC, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13125 Berlin
关键词
Manometry; Rectal cancer; Sphincter;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-004-1173-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose: Preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) followed by curative surgery is a well-accepted therapeutic option in the treatment of advanced rectal cancer. Usually, the anal sphincter is located in the irradiation area of a preoperative RCT regime. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of preoperative RCT on anal sphincter function. Patients and Methods: Between 1994 and 2000, 102 patients with rectal cancer stage uT3/uT4 were analyzed. All patients underwent radiotherapy with 45 Gy (5 × 1.8 Gy) including two cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (folinic acid) chemotherapy. 46 patients were treated additionally with up to five sessions of locoregional hyperthermia. The sphincter function was analyzed by perfusion manometry before preoperative therapy and 4 weeks after pretreatment had been finished. For statistics, the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used (SPSS 9.0 for Windows®). Results: The mean value of all 102 patients showed a significant reduction of the mean maximum resting pressure from 97 to 89 mmHg (p = 0.02). For the mean maximal squeeze pressure no significant difference could be shown (178 vs. 176 mmHg). For patients with distal (≤ 7.5 cm from anal verge) tumors the difference was highly significant (92 vs. 79 mmHg). Locoregional hyperthermia had no additional influence on sphincter function. Conclusion: Preoperative RCT impairs sphincter function especially in patients with distal tumors. In addition, RCT could have a negative influence on the continence of patients who received sphincter-preserving surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 288
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Amman K., Kirchmayr W., Klaus A., Et al., Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on anal sphincter function in patients with carcinoma of the midrectum and low rectum, Arch Surg, 138, pp. 257-261, (2003)
[2]  
Krebs in Deutschland. Häufigkeiten und Trends, (1999)
[3]  
Batignani G., Monaci I., Ficari F., Et al., What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum?, Dis Colon Rectum, 34, pp. 329-335, (1991)
[4]  
Birnbaum E.H., Dreznik Z., Myerson R.J., Et al., Early effect of external beam radiation therapy on the anal sphincter: A study using anal manometry and transrectal ultrasound, Dis Colon Rectum, 35, pp. 757-761, (1992)
[5]  
Freys S.M., Fuchs K.H., Fein M., Et al., Inter- and intraindividual reproducibility of anorectal manometry, Langenbecks Arch Surg, 383, pp. 325-329, (1998)
[6]  
Hallbook O., Pahlman L., Krog M., Et al., Randomised comparison of straight and J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection, Ann Surg, 224, pp. 58-65, (1996)
[7]  
Hayne D., Vaizey C.J., Boulos P.B., Anorectal injury following pelvic radiotherapy, Br J Surg, 88, pp. 1037-1048, (2001)
[8]  
Herrmann T., Petersen S., Hellmich G., Et al., Spättoxizität nach präoperativer kurzzeitbestrahlung und risikoadaptierter postoperativer nachbestrahlung bei operablem rektumkarzinom, Strahlenther Onkol, 175, pp. 430-436, (1999)
[9]  
Ho Y.H., Tan M., Seow-Choen F., Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: Comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis, Br J Surg, 83, pp. 978-980, (1996)
[10]  
Hoffmann K.T., Rau B., Wust P., Et al., Restaging of locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum with MR imaging after preoperative radio-chemotherapy plus regional hyperthermia, Strahlenther Onkol, 178, pp. 386-392, (2002)