Postharvest fungicide dips to control fruit rot of ‘Monthong’ durian (Durio zibethinus)

被引:0
作者
Rawat Piasai
Peter Chalmers
Onuma Piasai
Netnapis Khewkhom
机构
[1] Kasetsart University,Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture
[2] Adama (Thailand) Ltd.,undefined
来源
European Journal of Plant Pathology | 2021年 / 160卷
关键词
Durian; Fruit rot; Postharvest; Fungicide dipping; Residue analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fruit rot diseases are the serious problem in durian production for domestic consumption and export. Fungicides are commonly applied to reduce postharvest loss caused by postharvest diseases. The objective of this research was to study the efficacy of fungicides for controlling durian fruit rot diseases. Diseased durian cv. ‘Monthong’ were collected from three orchards from Tha Mai district, Chanthaburi province. Fungi were then isolated by tissue transplanting method and identified based on morphological characteristics. Three fungi including Fusarium solani, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, and Phomopsis sp. were confirmed as causal agents of fruit rot on durian. Ten concentrations of two ready-mix fungicides, which were Bumper P® (prochloraz 40% + propiconazole 9% W/V EC) and Custodia® (azoxystrobin 12% + tebuconazole 20% W/V SC), were evaluated towards the inhibition of the fungal growths. From in vitro experiment, both treatments could inhibit the mycelial growth at different levels. The EC50 of Bumber P® and Custodia® were 9.7–49.11 and 7.93–196.73 mg L−1 and respectively. In vivo experiments by dipping fruits showed that Bumper P® and/or Custodia® at the minimum rate of 1 ml L−1 exhibited strong control durian fruit rot caused by F. solani and Phomopsis sp., but both fungicide mixtures could not control L. theobromae. The results of residue analysis illustrated that no residues were detected in the edible pulp. This is important to ensure that the treated durian is safe for consumptions and these fungicides are suitable for the postharvest application in durian.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 336
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Anand T(2008)Effectiveness of azoxystrobin in the control of Journal of Plant Protection Research 48 147-159
[2]  
Chandrasekaran A(2015) and Plant Pathology 65 124-136
[3]  
Kuttalam SP(2005) on cucumber New Zealand Plant Protection 58 89-95
[4]  
Raguchander GST(2017)Effect of azole fungicide mixtures, alternations and dose on azole sensitivity in the wheat pathogen Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 22 1780-707
[5]  
Samiyappan R(2013)Testing efficacy of fungicides against postharvest pathogens of avocado ( Phytopathology 103 690-759
[6]  
Dooley H(2007) cv. Crop Protection 26 753-72
[7]  
Shaw MW(2013)) International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology 3 66-863
[8]  
Spink J(2005)Residue Dynamics and Risk Assessment of Prochloraz and Its Metabolite 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol in Apple Crop Protection 24 853-43
[9]  
Kildea S(2019)The usefulness of fungicide mixtures and alternation for delaying the selection for resistance in populations of Philippine Journal of Crop Science 44 36-1029
[10]  
Everett KR(2015) on winter wheat: a modeling analysis Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology 6 298-249