Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

被引:0
作者
Vegard Stolsmo Foldal
Marit Solbjør
Martin Inge Standal
Egil Andreas Fors
Roger Hagen
Gunnhild Bagøien
Roar Johnsen
Karen Walseth Hara
Heidi Fossen
Ida Løchting
Hedda Eik
Margreth Grotle
Lene Aasdahl
机构
[1] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science
[2] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences
[3] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practice Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
[4] University of Oslo,Department of Psychology
[5] Research Institute,Division of Psychiatry, Tiller Community Mental Health Centre, St. Olavs Hospital
[6] Trondheim University Hospital,Norwegian Advisory Unit on Complex Symptom Disorders
[7] The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service of Trøndelag,Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy
[8] St. Olavs Hospital,Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI) Clinic for Surgery and Neurology
[9] Trondheim University Hospital,undefined
[10] Oslo Metropolitan University,undefined
[11] Oslo University Hospital,undefined
[12] Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Centre,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2021年 / 31卷
关键词
Motivational interviewing; Return to work; Sick leave; RE-AIM; Process evaluation; Mixed-methods; Social insurance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate potential barriers and facilitators for implementing motivational interviewing (MI) as a return to work (RTW) intervention in a Norwegian social insurance setting. Methods A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial involving MI sessions delivered by social insurance caseworkers. The study was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework using focus groups with the caseworkers. MI fidelity was evaluated through audio-recordings of MI sessions and questionnaires to sick-listed participants. Results Lack of co-worker and managerial support, time and place for practicing to further develop MI skills, and a high workload made the MI intervention challenging for the caseworkers. The MI method was experienced as useful, but difficult to master. MI fidelity results showed technical global scores over the threshold for “beginning proficiency” whereas the relational global score was under the threshold. The sick-listed workers reported being satisfied with the MI sessions. Conclusions Despite caseworker motivation for learning and using MI in early follow-up sessions, MI was hard to master and use in practice. Several barriers and facilitators were identified; these should be addressed before implementing MI in a social insurance setting.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 795
页数:10
相关论文
共 143 条
[91]  
Gross DP(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[92]  
Park J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[93]  
Rayani F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[94]  
Norris CM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[95]  
Esmail S(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[96]  
Park J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[97]  
Esmail S(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[98]  
Rayani F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[99]  
Norris CM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[100]  
Gross DP(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined