Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

被引:0
作者
Vegard Stolsmo Foldal
Marit Solbjør
Martin Inge Standal
Egil Andreas Fors
Roger Hagen
Gunnhild Bagøien
Roar Johnsen
Karen Walseth Hara
Heidi Fossen
Ida Løchting
Hedda Eik
Margreth Grotle
Lene Aasdahl
机构
[1] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science
[2] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences
[3] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practice Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
[4] University of Oslo,Department of Psychology
[5] Research Institute,Division of Psychiatry, Tiller Community Mental Health Centre, St. Olavs Hospital
[6] Trondheim University Hospital,Norwegian Advisory Unit on Complex Symptom Disorders
[7] The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service of Trøndelag,Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy
[8] St. Olavs Hospital,Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI) Clinic for Surgery and Neurology
[9] Trondheim University Hospital,undefined
[10] Oslo Metropolitan University,undefined
[11] Oslo University Hospital,undefined
[12] Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Centre,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2021年 / 31卷
关键词
Motivational interviewing; Return to work; Sick leave; RE-AIM; Process evaluation; Mixed-methods; Social insurance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate potential barriers and facilitators for implementing motivational interviewing (MI) as a return to work (RTW) intervention in a Norwegian social insurance setting. Methods A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial involving MI sessions delivered by social insurance caseworkers. The study was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework using focus groups with the caseworkers. MI fidelity was evaluated through audio-recordings of MI sessions and questionnaires to sick-listed participants. Results Lack of co-worker and managerial support, time and place for practicing to further develop MI skills, and a high workload made the MI intervention challenging for the caseworkers. The MI method was experienced as useful, but difficult to master. MI fidelity results showed technical global scores over the threshold for “beginning proficiency” whereas the relational global score was under the threshold. The sick-listed workers reported being satisfied with the MI sessions. Conclusions Despite caseworker motivation for learning and using MI in early follow-up sessions, MI was hard to master and use in practice. Several barriers and facilitators were identified; these should be addressed before implementing MI in a social insurance setting.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 795
页数:10
相关论文
共 143 条
  • [1] Gabbay M(2011)NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity Br J Gen Pract 61 e118-e124
  • [2] Taylor L(2004)Predictors of disability pension in long-term sickness absence: results from a population-based and prospective study in Norway 1994–1999 Eur J Public Health 14 398-405
  • [3] Sheppard L(2013)The effect of ill health and socioeconomic status on labor force exit and re-employment: a prospective study with ten years follow-up in the Netherlands Scand J Work Environ Health 39 134-143
  • [4] Hillage J(2001)Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain Dis Manag Health Outcomes 9 351-360
  • [5] Bambra C(2005)Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature J Occup Rehabil 15 607-631
  • [6] Ford F(1999)Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework Am J Public Health 89 1322-1327
  • [7] Preece R(2013)The RE-AIM Framework: a systematic review of use over time Am J Public Health 103 E38-46
  • [8] Taske N(2012)A participatory return-to-work program for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: a process evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial J Occup Rehabil 22 127-140
  • [9] Kelly MP(2009)A participatory workplace intervention for employees with distress and lost time: a feasibility evaluation within a randomized controlled trial J Occup Rehabil 19 212-222
  • [10] Gjesdal S(2018)Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods BMC Health Serv Res 18 756-537