Using Variables in School Mathematics: Do School Mathematics Curricula Provide Support for Teachers?

被引:0
作者
James Dogbey
机构
[1] Texas A & M University—Corpus Christi,
来源
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education | 2016年 / 14卷
关键词
Content analysis; Curriculum; School mathematics; Teachers; Variables;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study employed content analysis to examine 3 popular middle-grades mathematics curricula in the USA on the support they provide for teachers to implement concepts associated with variables in school mathematics. The results indicate that each of the 3 curricula provides some type of support for teachers, but in a varied amount and quality. More specifically, whereas the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (UCSMP) curriculum provides support for teachers on several aspects of using variables in school mathematics, the support found in the Connected Mathematics 2 and the Math Connects curricula focused mainly on one conception of variables—namely, the use of variables as quantity that varies in the Connected Mathematics 2 curriculum and the use of variables as specific unknowns in the Math Connects curriculum. Overall, the UCSMP curriculum provides the most support for teachers, followed by the Connected Mathematics 2 curriculum, with the Math Connects curriculum recording the least support for teachers to enact variable concepts. It is worth pointing out that, although the 3 curricula collectively provide guidance for teachers to implement variable ideas within meaningful real-world contexts, the supports identified in the respective curriculum were not sufficient in addressing all of the areas that are essential for teaching the many concepts associated with variables in school mathematics effectively. Recommendations for curriculum developers and for international researchers with interest in the roles of variables in school mathematics are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1196
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Asquith S(2007)Middle-school math teachers’ knowledge of students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable Mathematical Thinking and Learning 9 247-270
[2]  
Stephens A(1990)Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21 132-144
[3]  
Knuth J(1996)Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher 25 6-8
[4]  
Alibali W(2013)When is a school environment perceived as supportive by beginning math teachers? Effects of leadership, trust, autonomy and appraisal on teaching quality International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11 1029-1048
[5]  
Ball DL(2007)Interactions between knowledge of variables and knowledge about teaching variables Sosyal Bilimler Arastırmaları Dergisi 1 1-18
[6]  
Ball D(1981)Translation difficulties in learning mathematics The American Mathematical Monthly 8 286-290
[7]  
Cohen D(1960)A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 37-46
[8]  
Blömeke S(2012)Treatment of variables in popular middle-grades mathematics textbooks in the USA: Trends from 1957 through 2009 International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2 1-30
[9]  
Klein P(1993)Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24 94-116
[10]  
Boz N(2008)A framework for analyzing differences across mathematics curricula Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership 10 10-17