Consolidation and Maintenance Therapies for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents

被引:0
作者
Nitya Nathwani
Jeremy T. Larsen
Prashant Kapoor
机构
[1] City of Hope National Medical Center,Judy and Bernard Briskin Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Hematology/Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
[2] Mayo Clinic,Division of Hematology
来源
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports | 2016年 / 11卷
关键词
Consolidation; Maintenance; Multiple myeloma;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Advances in therapy in multiple myeloma have resulted in significant improvements in patient outcomes; however, relapse remains problematic. Strategies to improve outcomes following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) include consolidation to intensify therapy and improve depth of response and maintenance therapy to achieve long-term disease control. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), including thalidomide and lenalidomide, are appealing as maintenance therapy given their oral administration; however, the cumulative toxicities of thalidomide have limited its efficacy in maintenance therapy. Maintenance lenalidomide is better tolerated, and multiple studies have demonstrated an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), but its impact on overall survival (OS) remains controversial. Additional concerns regarding the risk of second primary malignancies and significant cost of long-term lenalidomide therapy have also been raised. Proteasome inhibitors, particularly, bortezomib have also been incorporated in consolidation and maintenance regimens alone or in combination with an IMiD. Preliminary studies have suggested bortezomib maintenance may benefit patients with adverse cytogenetics, including t(4;14) and deletion 17p. Determination of the optimal consolidation and maintenance regimen and duration of therapy post-transplantation is a focus of several ongoing randomized studies.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 136
页数:9
相关论文
共 245 条
[1]  
Kapoor P(2013)Importance of achieving stringent complete response after autologous stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol : Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 31 4529-35
[2]  
Kumar SK(2012)High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma Blood 119 687-91
[3]  
Dispenzieri A(2013)Minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry in multiple myeloma: impact on outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study J Clin Oncol 31 2540-7
[4]  
Lacy MQ(2014)Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma Blood 123 3073-9
[5]  
Buadi F(2015)Minimal residual disease in myeloma by flow cytometry: independent prediction of survival benefit per log reduction Blood 125 1932-5
[6]  
Dingli D(2008)Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation Blood 112 4017-23
[7]  
Paiva B(2015)Bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone, with or without cyclophosphamide, for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: 5-year follow-up Br J Haematol 171 344-54
[8]  
Gutierrez NC(2015)Long-term results of the GIMEMA VEL-03-096 trial in MM patients receiving VTD consolidation after ASCT: MRD kinetics’ impact on survival Leukemia 29 689-95
[9]  
Rosinol L(2003)Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 349 2495-502
[10]  
Vidriales MB(2001)Interferon as therapy for multiple myeloma: an individual patient data overview of 24 randomized trials and 4012 patients Br J Haematol 113 1020-34