The Rankings Game: Managing Business School Reputation

被引:0
|
作者
Corley K. [1 ]
Gioia D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pennsylvania State University,
关键词
advertising; brand; communications; corporate branding; e-communication; identity; image; intangibles; philanthropy; positioning; reputation; stakeholder;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540123
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The environment of business education now resembles aspects of the competitive environment facing for-profit industries. A major contributor to the character of this environment in the USA are the published rankings of business school programs, which have risen in prominence over the last decade. We conducted interviews with top management team members from the top 50 business schools in the USA to assess the effects of business school rankings on the conduct of business education. These informants characterized the rankings process predominantly as a game where the players face a field that is not always level and where the rules are not only ill-specified but also subtly changing. Our examination of how business schools play ‘the rankings game’ revealed a structuration-like pattern whereby projected images by business schools and subsequent responses to those images both enabled and constrained further action by the schools as well as the magazines responsible for the rankings. This pattern has implications not only for gaining insights into the management of reputation in academia, but also for conceptualizing relationships among image and substance in a world increasingly dominated by media. © 2000, Palgrave Macmillan.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 333
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE INFLUENCE OF UNIVERSITY RANKINGS ON UNIVERSITY REPUTATION THROUGH RANKINGS' FUNCTIONS AND STAKEHOLDERS' BELIEFS TOWARDS A UNIVERSITY
    Sarupiciute, Julija
    Druteikiene, Greta
    EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 4215 - 4221
  • [22] Business Reputation Potential
    Raikov, A. N.
    SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2009, 36 (03) : 170 - 176
  • [23] Managing Reputation over MANETs
    Bella, G.
    Costantino, G.
    Riccobene, S.
    FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION ASSURANCE AND SECURITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 255 - 260
  • [24] Reputation and the Best Hospital Rankings: What Does It Really Mean?
    Cua, Santino
    Moffatt-Bruce, Susan
    White, Susan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2017, 32 (06) : 632 - 637
  • [25] The labor of reputation building: Creating, developing and managing individual reputation
    Dumont, Guillaume
    CONSUMPTION MARKETS & CULTURE, 2018, 21 (06) : 515 - 531
  • [26] A Framework for Reputation Bootstrapping Based on Reputation Utility and Game Theories
    Jiao, Han
    Liu, Jixue
    Li, Jiuyong
    Liu, Chengfei
    TRUSTCOM 2011: 2011 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE OF IEEE TRUSTCOM-11/IEEE ICESS-11/FCST-11, 2011, : 344 - 351
  • [27] UK business school rankings over the last 30 years (1980-2010): trends and explanations
    Wilkins, Stephen
    Huisman, Jeroen
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 63 (03) : 367 - 382
  • [28] Formation of Reputation in Business Markets
    Xie, Chunyan
    Haugland, Sven
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS MARKETING, 2016, 23 (01) : 25 - 45
  • [29] Managing the reputation of an award to motivate performance
    C. Gavrila
    J.P. Caulkins
    G. Feichtinger
    G. Tragler
    R.F. Hartl
    Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2005, 61 : 1 - 22
  • [30] Managing the reputation of an award to motivate performance
    Gavrila, C
    Caulkins, JP
    Feichtinger, G
    Tragler, G
    Hartl, RF
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 61 (01) : 1 - 22