Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): A systematic review

被引:38
作者
Gagnon M.-P. [1 ,2 ]
Desmartis M. [1 ]
Poder T. [3 ,4 ]
Witteman W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, 10 rue de l'Espinay, D6-726, Quebec City, G1L 3L5, QC
[2] Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC
[3] UETMIS, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC
[4] Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Ambassador model; Health technology assessment; Hospital budget; HTA units; Impact of HTA activities; Internal committee; Local/hospital-based HTA; Mini-HTA; Perceptions of stakeholders;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-3-129
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly performed at the local or hospital level where the costs, impacts, and benefits of health technologies can be directly assessed. Although local/hospital-based HTA has been implemented for more than two decades in some jurisdictions, little is known about its effects and impact on hospital budget, clinical practices, and patient outcomes. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review that aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding the effects and impact of local/hospital-based HTA. Methods: We identified articles through PubMed and Embase and by citation tracking of included studies. We selected qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods studies with empirical data about the effects or impact of local/hospital-based HTA on decision-making, budget, or perceptions of stakeholders. We extracted the following information from included studies: country, methodological approach, and use of conceptual framework; local/hospital HTA approach and activities described; reported effects and impacts of local/hospital-based HTA; factors facilitating/hampering the use of hospital-based HTA recommendations; and perceptions of stakeholders concerning local/hospital HTA. Due to the great heterogeneity among studies, we conducted a narrative synthesis of their results. Results: A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. We reported the results according to the four approaches for performing HTA proposed by the Hospital Based HTA Interest Sub-Group: ambassador model, mini-HTA, internal committee, and HTA unit. Results showed that each of these approaches for performing HTA corresponds to specific needs and structures and has its strengths and limitations. Overall, studies showed positive impacts related to local/hospital-based HTA on hospital decisions and budgets, as well as positive perceptions from managers and clinicians. Conclusions: Local/hospital-based HTA could influence decision-making on several aspects. It is difficult to evaluate the real impacts of local HTA at the different levels of health care given the relatively small number of evaluations with quantitative data and the lack of clear comparators. Further research is necessary to explore the conditions under which local/hospital-based HTA results and recommendations can impact hospital policies, clinical decisions, and quality of care and optimize the use of scarce resources. © 2014 Gagnon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Cicchetti A., Marchetti M., Dibidino R., Corio M., Hospital based HTA. Hospital based health technology assessment., World-wide survey
[2]  
Granados A., Health technology assessment and clinical decision making: which is the best evidence?, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 15, pp. 585-592, (1999)
[3]  
Ehlers L., Vestergaard M., Kidholm K., Bonnevie B., Pedersen P.H., Jorgensen T., Jensen M.F., Kristensen F.B., Kjolby M., Doing mini-health technology assessments in hospitals: a new concept of decision support in health care?, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 22, pp. 295-301, (2006)
[4]  
Martelli N., Lelong A.S., Prognon P., Pineau J., Hospital-based health technology assessment for innovative medical devices in university hospitals and the role of hospital pharmacists: learning from international experience, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 29, pp. 185-191, (2013)
[5]  
Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Group P., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Med, 6, (2009)
[6]  
Gagnon M.-P., Abdeljelil A.B., Desmartis M., Legare F., Ouimet M., Gagnon J., St-Pierre M., Rhainds M., Coulombe M., Opportunities to Promote Efficiency in Hospital Decision-Making Through the Use of Health Technology Assessment, (2011)
[7]  
Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews
[8]  
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Systematic Reviews. CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care, (2009)
[9]  
Menon D., Marshall D., Technology assessment in teaching hospitals, Dimens Health Serv, 67, pp. 26-28, (1990)
[10]  
Cram N., Groves J., Foster L., Technology assessment-a survey of the clinical engineer's role within the hospital, J Clin Eng, 22, pp. 373-382, (1997)