Restricted and large-scale sustainability

被引:0
作者
Fulvio Mazzocchi
机构
[1] CNR-Institute of Heritage Science,
来源
Sustainability Science | 2024年 / 19卷
关键词
Restricted sustainability; Sense of separateness; Large-scale sustainability; Interdependence; Knowledge co-production; Indigenous knowledge; Value commitment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article argues for a new way of approaching sustainability, reconsidering its fundamental assumptions. It describes two contrasting stances, namely ‘restricted’ and ‘large-scale’ sustainability. Restricted sustainability, i.e. the current dominant approach, focuses mostly on human welfare and is still rooted in a dualistic (man/nature) conception and an underlying sense of separateness. Large-scale sustainability instead centres on the concept of interdependence, seeking to rediscover the multiple patterns of connections that typify the world, and to uphold an overall (thus not only human) enduring welfare. The article also illustrates how knowledge co-production, i.e. a methodology currently employed in sustainability science, can contribute to large-scale sustainability. Such a methodology fosters, in fact, the inclusion of alternative cultural perspectives and knowledge traditions, like Indigenous ones, which can provide insight on the subject. In its last part, the article discusses the relation between knowledge, values, and behaviour, supporting the idea that sustainability science should combine the pursuit of knowledge with ethical engagement and commitment to action. This too would contribute to the development of large-scale sustainability. Indigenous epistemologies are explored in this context, as they provide models of ethically oriented knowledge that should be translated into proper conduct towards the entire community of living beings.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 379
页数:6
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Andersen H(2016)Collaboration, interdisciplinarity, and the epistemology of contemporary science Stud Hist Philos Sci 56 1-10
[2]  
Berkes F(2000)Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management Ecol Appl 10 1251-1262
[3]  
Colding J(2015)Transdisciplinarity: a review of its origins, development, and current issues J Res Pract 11 1-2
[4]  
Folke C(2014)Ontology and indigeneity: on the political ontology of heterogeneous assemblages Cult Geogr 21 49-58
[5]  
Bernstein JH(2021)A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability Nat Sustain 4 93-100
[6]  
Blaser M(2016)Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113 4570-4578
[7]  
Caniglia G(1997)Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems Issues Ecol 2 1-16
[8]  
Luederitz C(2018)Cultural evolution of normative motivations for sustainable behaviour Nat Sustain 1 218-224
[9]  
von Wirth T(2015)The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14 1-16
[10]  
Clark WC(2014)Nonepistemic values and the multiple goals of science Philos Sci 81 1-21