Punitive Damages: A European Criminal Law Approach. State Sanctions and the System of Guarantees

被引:0
作者
Manuel Gómez Tomillo
机构
[1] Valladolid University (SPAIN),Departamento de Derecho penal, Facultad de Derecho
来源
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research | 2013年 / 19卷
关键词
Criminal law; Punitive damages; System of guarantees;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It has traditionally been upheld that punitive damages are incompatible with the Constitutions of civil law countries. This paper sustains the opposing thesis and argues their compatibility, of a general nature, with the basic principles of continental European States, and especially with the principles of legality, proportionality and non bis in idem. This opens the way to the enforcement, in Europe, of sentences delivered in the United States of America. However, despite this starting point, the advisability of exporting the model of punitive damages is rejected. The theme is expanded to argue the equivalent nature of the guarantees and limits of all sanctioning activity of the State and those already established in Criminal Law. This would encompass punitive damages and all types of civil sanctions.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 244
页数:29
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Behr V(2003)Private law, punishment, and disgorgement: punitive damages in American and German Law- Tendencies towards approximation of apparently irreconcilable concepts Chicago Kent Law Review 78 105-undefined
  • [2] Calandrillo SP(2010)Penalizing punitive damages: why the supreme court needs a lesson in Law and economics George Washington Law Review 78 774-undefined
  • [3] Cheh MM(1991)Constitutional limits on using civil remedies to achieve criminal Law objectives: understanding and transcending the criminal-civil Law distinction Hastings Law Journal 42 1325-undefined
  • [4] Coffee JC(1991)Does “unlawful” mean “criminal”?: reflections on the disappearing tort/crime distinction in American Law Buffalo Law Review 21 193-undefined
  • [5] Coffee JC(1992)Paradigms lost: the blurring of the criminal and civil law models and what can be done about it Yale Law Journal 101 1875-undefined
  • [6] Colby TB(2003)Beyond the multiple punishment problem: punitive damages as punishment for individual, private wrongs Minnesota Law Review 87 583-undefined
  • [7] Cooter RD(1997)Punitive damages, social norms and economic analysis Law & Contemporay Problems 73 60-undefined
  • [8] Crowley MA(2001)From punishment to annihilation: Engle v. R.J. Reynolds tobacco Co.—No more butts—punitive damages have gone too far Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 64 1513-undefined
  • [9] Crump D(1998)Evidence, economics, and ethics: what information should jurors be given to determine the amount of a punitive-damage award? Maryland Law Review 57 174-undefined
  • [10] Curcio AA(1993)Painful publicity—an alternative punitive damage sanction DePaul Law Review 57 341-undefined