Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Sexuality and Mate Choice Criteria

被引:0
作者
Bogdan Kostic
John E. Scofield
机构
[1] Missouri State University,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Missouri,Department of Psychological Sciences
来源
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2022年 / 51卷
关键词
Evolution; Sex differences; Sexual orientation; Mate choice;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous research has documented several reliable differences between men and women in terms of mate preferences regarding age, physical appearance, financial prospects, and more. However, most of the research has been on heterosexual populations. The current study attempted to further explore those differences in non-heterosexual populations. The project was part replication regarding heterosexual populations and part exploratory regarding non-heterosexual populations. The sample contained 3298 participants, including 1863 males (1675 gynephiles, 56 androphiles, 132 bisexuals) and 1435 females (1037 androphiles, 33 gynephiles, 365 bisexuals). Participants responded to questions about mate preferences in terms of good financial prospects, good looks, chastity, ambition/industriousness, youth/age, uncommitted sex, visual sexual stimuli, status, physical attractiveness, jealousy, and interest in short- versus long-term mating. Results replicated typical sex differences between heterosexual men and women in all measures we analyzed. We also found several instances when bisexual respondents were more different from heterosexual respondents than homosexual respondents (specifically regarding interest in uncommitted sex, the importance of chastity, and interest in short-term mating). Despite limitations in data collection, the results demonstrate that homosexual and bisexual individuals do not always form a heterogenous group.
引用
收藏
页码:2855 / 2865
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Archer J(2019)The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences Biological Reviews 94 1381-1415
[2]  
Bailey JM(1994)Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 1081-1093
[3]  
Gaulin S(2016)Sexual orientation, controversy, and science Psychological Science in the Public Interest 17 45-101
[4]  
Agyei Y(1989)Sex differences in human mate preference: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 1-49
[5]  
Gladue BA(1998)Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status Journal of Sex Research 35 19-31
[6]  
Bailey JM(1992)Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology Psychological Science 3 251-255
[7]  
Vasey PL(1993)Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating Psychological Review 100 204-232
[8]  
Diamond LM(2010)Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations American Psychologist 65 110-126
[9]  
Breedlove SM(2007)Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: Sexual selection theory revisited Archives of Sexual Behavior 36 717-723
[10]  
Vilain E(2003)A review of sex differences in sexual jealousy, including self-report data, psychophysiological responses, interpersonal violence, and morbid jealousy Personality and Social Psychology Review 7 102-128