Fogging the firm performance: an empirical examination of the annual report readability in India

被引:0
作者
Vismaya Gangadharan
Lakshmi Padmakumari
机构
[1] Krea University,IFMR GSB
来源
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance | 2024年 / 21卷
关键词
Annual report readability; Fog index; Firm performance; Tobin’s Q; ROCE; M41; G14; G11; G34;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Annual reports are the primary source of information for investors. It contains all the details about the company’s activities in the preceding financial year. About 80% of an annual report is text (Cheng et al. 2018); hence proper comprehension and readability enhance the usefulness of the information. Earlier researches prove the positive relationship between firm performance and annual report readability (Li 2008). Studies also find that complexity is a deliberate attempt by companies to obfuscate earnings management and poor performance (Bloomfield 2008). Against this backdrop, we investigate the relationship between firm value, financial performance and annual report readability in the Indian context. For this purpose, we use Gunning Fog Index (Flesch Kincaid index, Smog index, and File size as robustness checks) to measure the annual report readability of NSE 500 firms for the period 2016 to 2020. We find a positive relationship between firm performance (Tobin’s Q, ROA, and ROCE) and annual report readability. Further, this paper finds a positive relationship between the annual report readability and firm value (Tobin’s Q and ROA) in the next year. The findings will be helpful for the investors as it shows how vital is annual report readability in signaling future firm value. It shows the readability of the narrative content as an important signal about a firm’s current performance and prospects. This paper recommends that the management be more cautious while preparing financial disclosures because complex disclosures may send negative signals to the investors about the firm’s prospects.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 226
页数:15
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [1] Adelberg AH(1979)Narrative disclosures contained in financial reports: Means of communication or manipulation? Accounting and Business Research 9 179-190
  • [2] Ajina A(2016)Guiding through the Fog: Does annual report readability reveal earnings management? Research in International Business and Finance 38 509-516
  • [3] Laouiti M(2022)Do earnings management practices define the readability of the financial reports in India? Journal of Public Affairs 22 e2692-215
  • [4] Msolli B(2020)CSR performance and annual report readability: Evidence from France Corporate Governance (bingley) 20 201-369
  • [5] Arora S(2003)Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor?: A pretest estimator Economics Letters 79 361-109
  • [6] Chauhan Y(1999)MD&A quality as measured by the SEC and analysts’ earnings forecasts* Contemporary Accounting Research 16 75-34
  • [7] Bacha S(2001)Analyst coverage and intangible assets Journal of Accounting Research 39 1-116
  • [8] Ajina A(2016)Usefulness of corporate annual reports to individual investors in Bangladesh International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 13 97-252
  • [9] Baltagi BH(2021)How do auditors respond to low annual report readability? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 40 106769-367
  • [10] Bresson G(2008)Discussion of “Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence” Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 248-1652