How Do We Assess How Agentic We Are? A Literature Review of Existing Instruments to Evaluate and Measure Individuals' Agency

被引:0
作者
Federica Cavazzoni
Alec Fiorini
Guido Veronese
机构
[1] University of Milano-Bicocca,Department of Human Sciences “R. Mass”
[2] Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies,undefined
[3] Stellenbosch University,undefined
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2022年 / 159卷
关键词
Agency; Instrument; Agentic strategies; Structures; Measurement; Review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The importance and centrality of the construct of agency is wellknown amongst social scientists. Yet, there is still little agreement on how this construct should be understood and defined, as demonstrated by the diversity of instruments that are used to investigate it. Indeed, there is no current consensus or standardized methodology to assess agency. This paper provides a synthetic overview of the studies that have evaluated and measured individuals' agency. More specifically, the purpose is to review research that quantitatively investigates the agency of adults, as well as children and youth, across different social contexts. In the process, it offers recommendations to inform future research, practice, and policy. We identified published peer-reviewed studies relating to the assessment of agency across countries and across age through a narrative literature review. The findings were grouped according to whether agency was measured in its most comprehensive conception or in a precise single domain or dimension, which was then discussed separately for children, adults, and women. Of the 3879 studies identified from online searches of the literature and the five additional sources gathered through bibliography mining, 106 qualified for full review, with 34 studies included in the final synthesis. Multiple different instruments were found to be currently adopted or developed to assess agency. The present review offers an exhaustive overview of the different conceptualizations of agency and of the available instruments to assess it, providing critical information for researchers and policymakers to improve intervention and empowerment programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1125 / 1153
页数:28
相关论文
共 170 条
[31]  
Walk M(2021)Psychometric properties of the assessment tool for perceived agency (ATPA-22)–utility for the rehabilitation of young adults not in education, employment or training (NEETs) Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 28 97-44
[32]  
Chen G(2014)Factors promoting resilience following childhood sexual abuse: A structured, narrative review of the literature Child Abuse Review 23 17-558
[33]  
Gully SM(2017)What “blindness” to gender differences helps women see and do: Implications for confidence, agency, and action in male-dominated environments Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 142 28-903
[34]  
Eden D(2016)Critical consciousness and vocational development among Latina/o high school youth: Initial development and testing of a measure Journal of Career Assessment 24 543-20
[35]  
Cheong YF(2016)Predictors of civic engagement among highly involved young adults: Exploring the relationship between agency and systems worldview Journal of Community Psychology 44 888-267
[36]  
Yount KM(1998)Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 1197-557
[37]  
Crandall AA(2018)Gay-Straight Alliance involvement and youths' participation in civic engagement, advocacy, and awareness-raising Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 56 13-56
[38]  
Edmonds R(2011)Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 257-53
[39]  
Eteläpelto A(2018)Measuring women’s empowerment: A critical review of current practices andrecommendations for researchers Social Indicators Research 137 539-88
[40]  
Vähäsantanen K(2019)The effect of agency on women's mental distress: A prospective cohort study from rural Rajasthan, India Social Science & Medicine 233 47-582