Evaluation of the effects of low-impact development practices under different rainy types: case of Fuxing Island Park, Shanghai, China

被引:0
作者
Hong-Wu Wang
Yue-Jiao Zhai
Yuan-Yuan Wei
Yun-Feng Mao
机构
[1] Tongji University,State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Envrionmental Science and Technology
[2] Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2019年 / 26卷
关键词
Stormwater management; Low-impact development (LID); Water quantity; Water quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The soil permeability and underground water level greatly affect the performance of low-impact development (LID) practices. Shanghai is located in the area of estuary and is characterized by its high groundwater level and low soil infiltration rate. The LID practices in Fuxing Island Park, Shanghai, including a bioretention cell, swales, a permeable pavement, and a combined LID practices were studied in the present paper. The performance of LID practices during the period of eight rainfall events was evaluated in terms of hydrology and water quality. Due to the detention of the LID practices, a significant delay between the peak rainfall and the peak surface runoff was observed. On-site tests show it is suitable for the applicability of LID in a rainy city with low soil infiltration rate and high groundwater level. Moreover, the Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) was also used to compare the hydrologic effects before and after these four LID practices application in the park. Results indicated the LID practices could effectively reduce the runoff volume and the peak flow in the park. Furthermore, the runoff water quality evaluation showed the pollutants were effectively removed by these four LID practices due to both runoff treatment and flow volume reduction. The bioretention system proved to be effective as a result of its larger facility area while the swales had the obvious reduction volume both per facility area and per catchment area.
引用
收藏
页码:6706 / 6716
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Chandrasena GI(2014)E. coli removal in laboratory scale stormwater biofilters: influence of vegetation and submerged zone J Hydrol 519 814-822
[2]  
Pham T(2007)Field performance of bioretention: water quality Environ Eng Sci 24 1048-1064
[3]  
Payne EG(2008)Field performance of bioretention: hydrology impacts J Hydrol Eng 13 90-95
[4]  
Deletic A(2001)Laboratory study of biological retention for urban storm water management Water Environ Res 73 5-14
[5]  
Mccarthy DT(2012)A planning framework for sustainable urban drainage systems Water Policy 14 865-886
[6]  
Davis AP(2016)Governance of integrated urban water management in Melbourne, Australia Util Policy 43 48-58
[7]  
Davis AP(2015)Evaluation of heavy metal removal capacity of bioretention systems Water Air Soil Pollut 226 376-608
[8]  
Davis AP(2006)Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina J Irrig Drain E ASCE 132 600-408
[9]  
Shokouhian M(2008)Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, NC J Environ Eng 134 403-503
[10]  
Sharma H(2010)Runoff volume reduction by a level spreader-vegetated filter strip system in suburban Charlotte, N.C J Hydrol Eng 15 499-119