Nobel laureates are not hot

被引:0
作者
Marek Kosmulski
机构
[1] Lublin University of Technology,
来源
Scientometrics | 2020年 / 123卷
关键词
Nobel laureate; Citations; H-index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The achievements of all 97 Nobel laureates in Chemistry, Economy, Medicine, and Physics of the period 2010–2019 are compared with achievements of top non-Nobel scientists in terms of standard bibliometric indicators (number of publications, number of citations, Hirsch index), of the numbers of highly cited papers and of hot papers (as defined by WoS®), and of c, a composite score (Ioannidis et al. in PLoS Biol 14:e1002501, 2016). Ninety recent Nobel laureates were in top 100,000 scientists in terms of c, and 45 recent Nobel laureates were in top 6000 scientists in terms of c. Only 32 recent Nobel laureates were in top 6000 scientists in terms of ch (Hirsch-type index with self-citations excluded), 32 recent Nobel laureates were in top 6000 scientists in terms of the number of citations (self-citations excluded), 17 recent Nobel laureates were among the 6000 Highly Cited Researchers (WoS®), 4 recent Nobel laureates were in top 6000 scientists in terms of the number of hot papers, and 2 recent Nobel laureates were in top 6000 scientists in terms of the number of highly cited papers.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 495
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Biglu MH(2008)The influence of references per paper in the SCI to Impact Factors and the Matthew Effect Scientometrics 74 453-470
[2]  
Boettke PJ(2012)The impact of Nobel Prize winners in economics: Mainline vs. mainstream American Journal of Economics and Sociology 71 1219-1249
[3]  
Fink A(2019)Characterizing the highly cited articles: A large-scale bibliometric analysis of the top 1% most cited research Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 24 23-39
[4]  
Smith DJ(1986)Do Nobel prize winners write citation classics? Essays of an Information Scientist 9 182-187
[5]  
Dorta-González P(2005)An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 16569-16572
[6]  
Santana-Jiménez Y(2019)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field PLoS Biology 17 e3000384-456
[7]  
Garfield E(2016)Multiple citation indicators and their composite across scientific disciplines PLoS Biology 14 e1002501-565
[8]  
Hirsch JE(2012)Calibration against a reference set: A quantitative approach to assessment of the methods of assessment of scientific output Journal of Informetrics 6 451-99
[9]  
Ioannidis JPA(2018)Are you in top 1% (1‰) Scientometrics 118 557-476
[10]  
Baas J(2016)The Slavery of the Frontiers Human Neuroscience 10 556-undefined