Transforming a Traditional Inquiry-Based Science Unit into a STEM Unit for Elementary Pre-service Teachers: A View from the Trenches

被引:0
作者
Matthew Schmidt
Lori Fulton
机构
[1] University of Cincinnati,Instructional Design and Technology Program
[2] University of Hawaii,Institute for Teacher Education, Elementary Program
[3] Manoa,undefined
来源
Journal of Science Education and Technology | 2016年 / 25卷
关键词
Elementary; Teacher education; Technological literacy; STEM education; Rapid prototyping;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The need to prepare students with twenty-first-century skills through STEM-related teaching is strong, especially at the elementary level. However, most teacher education preparation programs do not focus on STEM education. In an attempt to provide an exemplary model of a STEM unit, we used a rapid prototyping approach to transform an inquiry-based unit on moon phases into one that integrated technology in a meaningful manner to develop technological literacy and scientific concepts for pre-service teachers (PSTs). Using qualitative case study methodology, we describe lessons learned related to the development and implementation of a STEM unit in an undergraduate elementary methods course, focusing on the impact the inquiry model had on PSTs’ perceptions of inquiry-based science instruction and how the integration of technology impacted their learning experience. Using field notes and survey data, we uncovered three overarching themes. First, we found that PSTs held absolutist beliefs and had a need for instruction on inquiry-based learning and teaching. Second, we determined that explicit examples of effective and ineffective technology use are needed to help PSTs develop an understanding of meaningful technology integration. Finally, the rapid prototyping approach resulted in a successful modification of the unit, but caused the usability of our digital instructional materials to suffer. Our findings suggest that while inquiry-based STEM units can be implemented in existing programs, creating and testing these prototypes requires significant effort to meet PSTs’ learning needs, and that iterating designs is essential to successful implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 315
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Banilower ER(2007)Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the national science foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative J Res Sci Teach 44 375-395
[2]  
Heck DJ(2008)Design thinking Harv Bus Rev 86 84-92
[3]  
Weiss IR(2011)Preservice teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and conceptions about learning Instr Sci 39 87-108
[4]  
Brown T(2011)Understanding technology literacy: a framework for evaluating educational technology integration TechTrends 55 45-52
[5]  
Chan K-W(2013)Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course Educ Tech Res Dev 61 563-580
[6]  
Davies RS(2006)Challenges new science teachers face Rev Educ Res 76 607-651
[7]  
Davies RS(2011)Rapid prototyping reconsidered J Contin High Educ 59 135-145
[8]  
Dean DL(2001)Standards for technological literacy Phi Delta Kappan 82 513-517
[9]  
Ball N(2010)Retrospective analysis of technological literacy of K-12 students in the USA Int J Technol Des Educ 20 277-303
[10]  
Davis EA(2013)Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN TechTrends 57 14-27