Intersecting social determinants of health among patients with childcare needs: a cross-sectional analysis of social vulnerability

被引:2
作者
Ganguly, Anisha P. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Alvarez, Kristin S. [1 ]
Mathew, Sheryl R. [1 ]
Soni, Virali [1 ]
Vadlamani, Suman [3 ]
Balasubramanian, Bijal A. [4 ,5 ]
Bhavan, Kavita P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Parkland Hlth, Ctr Innovat & Value, Dallas, TX 75247 USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Epidemiol Human Genet & Environm Sci, Houston Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Inst Implementat Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[6] Parkland Hlth, 5200 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
关键词
Social determinants of health; Childcare; Social vulnerability index; Intervention; Geospatial analysis; MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION; INTERVENTIONS; ASSOCIATION; BARRIERS; HOMELESS; PEOPLE; ACCESS; FAMILY; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-024-18168-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionAccess to childcare is an understudied social determinant of health (SDOH). Our health system established a childcare facility for patients to address childcare barriers to healthcare. Recognizing that social risk factors often co-exist, we sought to understand intersecting social risk factors among patients with childcare needs who utilized and did not utilize the childcare facility and identify residual unmet social needs alongside childcare needs.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of patients who enrolled in the childcare facility from November 2020 to October 2022 to compare parameters of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) associated with the census tract extracted from electronic medical record (EMR) data among utilizers and non-utilizers of the facility. Overall SVI and segmentation into four themes of vulnerability (socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial/ethnic minority status, and housing type/transportation) were compared across utilizers and utilizers. Number of 90th percentile indicators were also compared to assess extreme levels of vulnerability. A sample of utilizers additionally received a patient-reported social needs screening questionnaire administered at the childcare facility.ResultsAmong 400 enrollees in the childcare facility, 70% utilized childcare services and 30% did not. Utilizers and non-utilizers were demographically similar, though utilizers were more likely to speak Spanish (34%) compared to non-utilizers (22%). Mean SVI was similar among utilizers and non-utilizers, but the mean number of 90th percentile indicators were higher for non-utilizers compared to utilizers (4.3 +/- 2.7 vs 3.7 +/- 2.7, p = 0.03), primarily driven by differences in the housing type/transportation theme (p = 0.01). Non-utilizers had a lower rate of healthcare utilization compared to utilizers (p = 0.02). Among utilizers who received patient-reported screening, 84% had one unmet social need identified, of whom 62% agreed for additional assistance. Among social work referrals, 44% were linked to social workers in their medical clinics, while 56% were supported by social work integrated in the childcare facility.ConclusionsThis analysis of SDOH approximated by SVI showed actionable differences, potentially transportation barriers, among patients with childcare needs who utilized a health system-integrated childcare facility and patients who did not utilize services. Furthermore, residual unmet social needs among patients who utilized the facility demonstrate the multifactorial nature of social risk factors experienced by patients with childcare needs and opportunities to address intersecting social needs within an integrated intervention. Intersecting social needs require holistic examination and multifaceted interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Addressing childcare as a barrier to healthcare access through community partnerships in a large public health system [J].
Alvarez, Kristin S. ;
Bhavan, Kavita ;
Mathew, Sheryl ;
Johnson, Courtney ;
McCarthy, Amy ;
Garcia, Blanca ;
Callies, Marilyn ;
Stovall, Kelly ;
Harms, Michael ;
Kho, Kimberly A. .
BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (04)
[2]   Evidence-informed interventions and best practices for supporting women experiencing or at risk of homelessness: a scoping review with gender and equity analysis [J].
Andermann, Anne ;
Mott, Sebastian ;
Mathew, Christine M. ;
Kendall, Claire ;
Mendonca, Oreen ;
Harriott, Dawnmarie ;
McLellan, Andrew ;
Riddle, Alison ;
Saad, Ammar ;
Iqbal, Warda ;
Magwood, Olivia ;
Pottie, Kevin .
HEALTH PROMOTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN CANADA-RESEARCH POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 41 (01) :1-13
[3]  
Angus Jan E., 2013, Beyond barriers in studying disparities in women's access to health services in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative metasynthesis, DOI [10.1177/1049732312469464, DOI 10.1177/1049732312469464]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2023, CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index (SVI)
[5]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL DETERMINANTS
[6]   The association of neighborhood social vulnerability with surgical textbook outcomes among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery [J].
Azap, Rosevine A. ;
Paredes, Anghela Z. ;
Diaz, Adrian ;
Hyer, J. Madison ;
Pawlik, Timothy M. .
SURGERY, 2020, 168 (05) :868-875
[7]  
Billioux A., 2017, STANDARDIZED SCREENI, DOI DOI 10.31478/201705B
[8]   Unmet healthcare need, gender, and health inequalities in Canada [J].
Bryant, Toba ;
Leaver, Chad ;
Dunn, James .
HEALTH POLICY, 2009, 91 (01) :24-32
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2023, Getting to know GRASP
[10]  
Centers for Disease Control / Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2021, Innovative uses of SVI during COVID-19