The effect of audit committee characteristics on earnings management: Evidence from the United Kingdom

被引:37
作者
Habbash M. [1 ]
Sindezingue C. [2 ]
Salama A. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Administrative and Financial Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha
[2] Durham University, Durham Business School
关键词
Audit committee characteristics; Combined code; Corporate governance; Earnings management; Financial expert; Regulated industry sectors;
D O I
10.1057/jdg.2012.2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the impact of audit committee (AC) characteristics on earnings management (EM), of FTSE 350 companies, for the fiscal years 2006 and 2007. Characteristics such as number of members and meetings; independence; directors' remuneration; outside directorships; various types of financial expertise; AC members' ownership; regulated sector; and the listing on FTSE 100 are investigated. No significant association was found between absolute discretionary accruals and these characteristics, apart from in the regulated industry. The results for signed discretionary accruals show that some characteristics have an effect on either upward or downward EM. This reveals the importance of distinguishing between AC effectiveness on constraining upward and downward EM. This article explores some qualitative AC characteristics, which have not previously been examined. In addition, it is probably the first to examine the effect of several AC characteristics on EM in the UK context. The findings of this study provide useful insights for regulators in order to improve and reconsider the current regulations on AC mechanisms. The findings of generally ineffectual ACs in the United Kingdom, along with many similar findings from other countries (see Xie et al, 2003 and Baxter and Cotter, 2009), raise concerns about the current situation of the regulation and the composition of ACs. External auditors are warned against relying on the form rather than substance of ACs. © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 38
页数:25
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Abbott L.J., Parker S., Peters G.F., Audit committee characteristics and restatements, Auditing, 23, 1, pp. 69-87, (2004)
[2]  
Adams R.B., Ferreira D., Do directors perform for pay?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46, 1, pp. 154-171, (2008)
[3]  
Arya A., Glover J.C., Sunder S., Are unmanaged earnings always better for shareholders?, Accounting Horizons, 2, 4, pp. 111-116, (2003)
[4]  
Ashbaugh H., LaFond R., Mayhew B.W., Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence, Accounting Review, 78, 3, pp. 611-639, (2003)
[5]  
Baxter P., Cotter J., Audit committees and earnings quality, Accounting and Finance, 49, 2, pp. 267-290, (2009)
[6]  
Bedard J., Chtourou S.M., Courteau L., The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management, Auditing, 23, 2, pp. 13-35, (2004)
[7]  
Brown L.D., Ngo Higgins H., Managing earnings surprises in the US versus 12 other countries, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20, 4-5, pp. 373-398, (2001)
[8]  
Burgstahler D., Dichev I., Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 1, pp. 99-126, (1997)
[9]  
Chang J.C., Sun H.L., Cross-listed foreign firm's earnings informativeness, earnings management and disclosures of corporate governance information under SOX, The International Journal of Accounting, 44, 1, pp. 1-32, (2009)
[10]  
Chen K.Y., Elder R.J., Hsieh Y.M., Corporate governance and earnings management: The Implications of corporate governance best-practice principles for Taiwanese Listed companies, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 3, 2, pp. 73-105, (2007)