Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

被引：0
|
作者：
Yun Wang
Yanping Kuang
Qiuju Chen
Renfei Cai
机构：
[1] Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital
来源：
Trials | / 19卷
关键词：
GnRH antagonist; Progestin; Poor responders; LH surge;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Wang, Yun
    Kuang, Yanping
    Chen, Qiuju
    Cai, Renfei
    TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [2] Progestin vs. Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist for the Prevention of Premature Luteinizing Hormone Surges in Poor Responders Undergoing in vitro Fertilization Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chen, Qiuju
    Chai, Weiran
    Wang, Yun
    Cai, Renfei
    Zhang, Shaozhen
    Lu, Xuefeng
    Zeng, Xiaojing
    Sun, Lihua
    Kuang, Yanping
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [3] Long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus short agonist versus antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial
    Sunkara, Sesh Kamal
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    Faris, Raef
    Braude, Peter
    Khalaf, Yacoub
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (01) : 147 - 153
  • [4] The effects of flexible short protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist on preventing premature ovulation in poor responders
    Zhang, Yan
    Wang, Hongyou
    Zhang, Xinyue
    Hao, Yingying
    Yang, Jihong
    Li, Yangbai
    Feng, Ting
    Chen, Yandong
    Qian, Yun
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 309 (02) : 689 - 697
  • [5] Early administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus flexible antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol in poor responders: a randomized clinical trial
    Tayebeh Esfidani
    Ashraf Moini
    Arezoo Arabipoor
    Maryam Farid Mojtahedi
    Shima Mohiti
    Ensieh Salehi
    Ladan Kashani
    Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 26
  • [6] Early administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus flexible antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol in poor responders: a randomized clinical trial
    Esfidani, Tayebeh
    Moini, Ashraf
    Arabipoor, Arezoo
    Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid
    Mohiti, Shima
    Salehi, Ensieh
    Kashani, Ladan
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2021, 26 (01)
  • [7] The effects of flexible short protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist on preventing premature ovulation in poor responders
    Yan Zhang
    Hongyou Wang
    Xinyue Zhang
    Yingying Hao
    Jihong Yang
    Yangbai Li
    Ting Feng
    Yandong Chen
    Yun Qian
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024, 309 : 689 - 697
  • [8] Short gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus flexible antagonist versus clomiphene citrate regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial
    Schimberni, M.
    Ciardo, F.
    Schimberni, M.
    Giallonardo, A.
    De Pratti, V.
    Sbracia, M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (20) : 4354 - 4361
  • [9] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a novel method of ovarian stimulation in poor responders
    Nikolettos, N
    Al-Hasani, S
    Felberbaum, R
    Demirel, LC
    Kupker, W
    Montzka, P
    Xia, YX
    Schopper, B
    Sturm, R
    Diedrich, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02): : 202 - 207
  • [10] Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-Antagonist Versus GnRH-Agonist in Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders Undergoing IVF
    Sozos J. Fasouliotis
    Neri Laufer
    Shelley Sabbagh-Ehrlich
    Aby Lewin
    Arye Hurwitz
    Alex Simon
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2003, 20 : 455 - 460
12345