Effect of culture filtrate containing fusaric acid of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on defence enzymes in chickpea

被引:2
作者
Hamida D. [1 ]
Gowda V.T. [2 ]
Kundu A. [3 ]
Kaur R. [1 ]
Bag T.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi
[2] Division of Biochemistry, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi
[3] Division of Agriculture Chemicals, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, Pusa
关键词
Chickpea; Fusaric acid; Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris; PAL; Peroxidase; PPO; SOD;
D O I
10.1007/s42360-023-00702-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Production of fusaric acid (FA) by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (Foc) race 4 and 8 was estimated through the HPLC in culture filtrate which was recorded to be 126.88 ± 5.56 and 820.51 ± 13.37 mg/L respectively. The effect of these culture filtrate (CF) containing FA was studied on post-treatment physiological changes with reference to defence enzymes in chickpea cvs. WR 315 (resistant) and JG 62 (susceptible). Increased activity of peroxidase (POX) was detected in both cvs. WR 315 and JG 62 with the treatment of CF of race 4, 8, and pure FA standard but the accumulation of POX was more in cv. WR 315 (1.27–5.23 folds) than in cv. JG 62 (1.18–3.10 folds). Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity was recorded at 4.58–5.57 folds in resistant cv. WR 315 but 1.22–3.48 folds in cv. JG 62 with CF containing FA of race 8 followed by CF of race 4. Similar trends were also recorded in the accumulation of Super Oxide Dismutase (SOD) and Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase (PAL). SOD activity was found to increase with respect to control but higher activity was detected in cvs. WR 315 (1.1–1.43 times) and JG 62 (1.10–1.45 times) with the treatment of CF of races 4 and 8 followed by pure FA standard. Higher PAL activity was recorded in cvs. WR 315 (1.36–2.11 times) and JG 62 (1.33–2.18 times) with the treatment of CF of races 4 and 8. © Indian Phytopathological Society 2023.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 69
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Anonymous (2022-23) Project Co-Ordinator Report 2022-23, pp. 1-86
  • [2] Arias J.A., Secretory organelles and mitochondrial alterations induced by fusaric acid in root cells of Zea mays, Physiol Plant Pathol, 27, pp. 149-158, (1985)
  • [3] Armstrong G.M., Armstrong J.K., Formae speciales and races of Fusarium oxysporum causing wilt Diseases, Fusarium: Diseases, biology and taxonomy. Penn, pp. 391-399, (1981)
  • [4] Bani M., Rispail N., Evidente A., Rubiales D., Cimmino A., Identification of the main toxins isolated from Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi race 2 and their relation with isolates’ pathogenicity, J Agric Food Chem, 62, pp. 2574-2580, (2014)
  • [5] Berthiller F., Crews C., Dall'Asta C., Saeger S.D., Haesaert G., Karlovsky P., Oswald I.P., Seefelder W., Speijers G., Stroka J., Masked mycotoxins: a review, Mol Nutr Food Res, 57, 1, pp. 165-186, (2013)
  • [6] Bouizgarne B., El-Maarouf-Bouteau H., Frankart C., Reboutier D., Madiona K., Pennarun A.M., Monestiez M., Trouverie J., Amiar Z., Briand J., Early physiological responses of Arabidopsis thaliana cells to fusaric acid: toxic and signalling effects, New Phytol, 169, (2006)
  • [7] Christopher M.E., Miranda M., Major I.T., Constabel C.P., Gene expression profiling of systemically wound-induced defenses in hybrid poplar, Planta, 219, pp. 939-947, (2004)
  • [8] Dalvi U.S., Naik R.M., Chimote V.P., Harer P.N., Activity profile of defense related enzymes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) against Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris) at different growth stages, J Pure Appl Microbiol, 9, special, pp. 1-12, (2015)
  • [9] Datta J., Lal N., Induced temporal and spatial variation in host defence enzymes in response to Fusarium wilt in chickpea, J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci, 7, pp. 489-494, (2018)
  • [10] Dean R., Van Kan J.A., Pretorius Z.A., Hammond-Kosack K.E., Di Pietro A., Spanu P.D., The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology, Mol Plant Pathol, 13, pp. 414-430, (2012)