Representing Attitudes Towards Ambiguity in Hilbert Space: Foundations and Applications

被引:0
作者
Sandro Sozzo
机构
[1] University of Leicester,School of Business and IQSCS
来源
Foundations of Science | 2021年 / 26卷
关键词
Decision theory; Ellsberg paradox; Quantum structures; Quantum modelling; Uncertainty; Hope and fear effects;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We provide here a general mathematical framework to model attitudes towards ambiguity which uses the formalism of quantum theory as a “purely mathematical formalism, detached from any physical interpretation”. We show that the quantum-theoretic framework enables modelling of the Ellsberg paradox, but it also successfully applies to more concrete human decision-making tests involving financial, managerial and medical decisions. In particular, we elaborate a mathematical representation of various empirical studies which reveal that attitudes of managers towards uncertainty shift from ambiguity seeking to ambiguity aversion, and viceversa, thus exhibiting hope effects and fear effects. The present framework provides a promising direction towards the development of a unified theory of decisions in the presence of uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 128
页数:25
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Aerts D(2009)Quantum structure in cognition Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53 314-348
[2]  
Aerts D(2013)Quantum structure and human thought Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 274-276
[3]  
Broekaert J(2013)Concepts and their dynamics: A quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought Topics in Cognitive Science 5 737-772
[4]  
Gabora L(2018)Testing ambiguity and Machina preferences within a quantum-theoretic framework for decision-making Journal of Mathematical Economics 78 176-185
[5]  
Sozzo S(2018)A proposal to extend expected utility in a quantum probabilistic framework Economic Theory 65 1079-1109
[6]  
Aerts D(2016)On the foundations of the Brussels operational-realistic approach to cognition Frontiers in Physics 74 117-127
[7]  
Gabora L(2016)From ambiguity aversion to a generalized expected utility. Modeling preferences in a quantum probabilistic framework Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53 3666-3682
[8]  
Sozzo S(2014)Identifying quantum structures in the Ellsberg paradox International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21 503-546
[9]  
Aerts D(1953)Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque, critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine Econometrica 78 40-50
[10]  
Geriente S(2017)The Ellsberg paradox: A challenge to quantum decision theory? Journal of Mathematical Psychology 101 1547-1560