Biogas: Clean Energy Access with Low-Cost Mitigation of Climate Change

被引:0
作者
E. Somanathan
Randall Bluffstone
机构
[1] Indian Statistical Institute,Economics and Planning Unit
[2] South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics,Department of Economics
[3] ICIMOD,undefined
[4] Portland State University,undefined
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2015年 / 62卷
关键词
Biogas; Mitigation; REDD+; Carbon offsets; Energy access;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using data from the nearly 6000 households in the Nepal Living Standards Survey of 2010–11 we find that the mean reduction in household firewood collection associated with use of a biogas plant for cooking is about 1100 kg/year from a mean of ∼\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim $$\end{document}2400 kg/year. This estimate is derived comparing only households with and without biogas in the same village, thus effectively removing the influence of many potential confounders. Further controls for important determinants of firewood collection, such as household size, per capita consumption expenditure, cattle ownership, unemployment etc. are used to identify the effect of biogas adoption on firewood collection. We derive bounds on omitted variable bias using the proportional selection assumption. Our central estimate is much smaller than those in the previous literature, but is still large enough for the cost of adopting biogas to be heavily subsidized via carbon offsets at a modest carbon price of $10/tCO2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$_2$$\end{document}e, when using central estimates of emission factors and global warming potentials of pollutants taken from the scientific literature.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 277
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Altonji Joseph G(2005)Selection on observed and unobserved variables: assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools J Political Econ 113 151-61
[2]  
Elder Todd E(2010)The environmental impact of poverty: evidence from firewood collection in rural Nepal Econ Dev Cult Change 59 23-904
[3]  
Taber Christopher R(2011)Energy poverty in rural Bangladesh Energy Policy 39 894-52
[4]  
Baland Jean-Marie(2013)REDD+ and community-controlled forests in low-income countries: any hope for a linkage Ecol Econ 87 43-5552
[5]  
Bardhan Pranab(2013)Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment J Geophys Res atmos 118 5380-562
[6]  
Das Sanghamitra(2003)The energy transition in action: urban domestic fuel choices in a changing Zimbabwe Energy Policy 31 553-29
[7]  
Mookherjee Dilip(2014)Greening China’s rural energy: new insights on the potential of smallholder biogas Environ Dev Econ 19 8-217
[8]  
Sarkar Rinki(2008)Fuelwood, forests and community management-evidence from household studies Environ Dev Econ 13 103-7542
[9]  
Barnes DF(1998)Rural household energy consumption: the effects of access to electricity—evidence from South Africa Energy Policy 26 207-361
[10]  
Khandker SR(2011)Health and climate benefits of cookstove replacement options Energy Policy 39 7530-887