The more business owners, the merrier? The role of tertiary education

被引:0
作者
Mirjam van Praag
André van Stel
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,Amsterdam Center for Entrepreneurship (ACE)
[2] Panteia/EIM,undefined
来源
Small Business Economics | 2013年 / 41卷
关键词
Business ownership; Human capital; (Returns to) education; Cross-country comparison; Production function; E23; J24; L26; O40; O57;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Policy in developed countries is often based on the assumption that higher business ownership rates induce economic value. Recent microeconomic empirical evidence may lead to a more nuanced view: Especially the top-performing business owners are responsible for the value creation of business owners. Other labor market participants would contribute more to economic value creation as an employee than as a business owner. The implied existence of an “optimal” business ownership rate would thus replace the dictum of “the more business owners, the merrier.” We attempt to establish whether there is such an optimal level, i.e., a quadratic relation between the business ownership rate and economic output rather than a linear or higher-order relationship, while investigating the role of tertiary education. Two findings stand out. First, by estimating extended versions of traditional Cobb–Douglas production functions on a sample of 19 OECD countries over the period 1981–2006, we indeed find robust evidence of an optimal business ownership rate. Second, the relation between business ownership and macroeconomic productivity is steeper for countries with higher participation rates in tertiary education. Thus, the optimal business ownership rate tends to decrease with tertiary education levels. This is consistent with microeconomic theory and evidence showing that business owners with higher levels of human capital run larger firms.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 357
页数:22
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]  
Armour J(2008)Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship American Law and Economics Review 10 303-350
[2]  
Cumming D(2002)Impeded industrial restructuring: The growth penalty Kyklos 55 81-98
[3]  
Audretsch D(2004)Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance Regional Studies 38 949-959
[4]  
Carree M(2004)Entrepreneurship and regional growth: An evolutionary interpretation Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 605-616
[5]  
van Stel A(2007)Entrepreneurial signalling via education: A success factor in innovative start-ups Small Business Economics 29 173-190
[6]  
Thurik R(1991)Economic growth in a cross-section of countries Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 407-433
[7]  
Audretsch D(1992)Convergence Journal of Political Economy 100 223-251
[8]  
Keilbach M(2005)SMEs, growth, and poverty: Cross-country evidence Journal of Economic Growth 10 199-229
[9]  
Audretsch D(2008)Being independent is a great thing: Subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy Economica 75 362-383
[10]  
Keilbach M(2004)Self-employment: More may not be better Swedish Economic Policy Review 11 15-73